Petre,
- Original Message -
From: "Petre Agenbag" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: mailing.database.mysql
Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 9:01 AM
Subject: Re: MAX vs plain vanilla mysql
> Thanks,
>
> So, just to be 100% sure, the BEST to do is to install max, as
Thanks,
So, just to be 100% sure, the BEST to do is to install max, as I can't
see any reason why NOT to...? No performance issues when used as a plain
vanilla model, no stability and no security issues either, only "down"
side to it is that it is a tad bit larger ?
PS,
Oh, and why do I alway
At 19:31 +0200 7/2/02, Petre Agenbag wrote:
>Thanks,
>So, if you install MySQL MAX, you can use either myisam OR innodb /
>bdb tables, ie, if I install ONE mysql max server, then different
>users on the server can use different types of tables(innodb/myisam)
>as they choose?, also, if you creat
Thanks,
So, if you install MySQL MAX, you can use either myisam OR innodb / bdb
tables, ie, if I install ONE mysql max server, then different users on
the server can use different types of tables(innodb/myisam) as they
choose?, also, if you create one db, can you have different types of
tables
Hi!
I have to correct: if you put
[mysqld]
skip-innodb
skip-bdb
to your my.cnf, then -Max uses only about 1.5 MB more memory than plain
MySQL, because of a larger executable.
MyISAM tables in -Max are as reliable as in plain MySQL. It is the same
source code.
Best regards,
Heikki
Innobase Oy
Petre,
Monday, July 01, 2002, 9:26:49 AM, you wrote:
PA> Probably a stupid question, but which is best to have on ones server,
PA> the "old" mysql, or max. I.O.W, if you install MAX and never use innodb
PA> or berkeley tables, will it be equivalent to a normal mysql installation
PA> wrt perform
