Re: Lock Tables - Manual Ambiguity

2003-06-18 Thread Egor Egorov
ulian > - Original Message - > From: "Egor Egorov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 1:33 PM > Subject: Re: Lock Tables - Manual Ambiguity > > >> "K.L." <[EMAIL

Re: Lock Tables - Manual Ambiguity

2003-06-18 Thread Primaria Falticeni
So, when client X has Read lock, the client Y cannot have Write lock, Egor? Iulian - Original Message - From: "Egor Egorov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 1:33 PM Subject: Re: Lock Tables - Manual Ambiguity > "K

Re: Lock Tables - Manual Ambiguity

2003-06-18 Thread Egor Egorov
"K.L." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The 3.23.54 Manual states in; > > Section 1.4.4.3 Transactions > > "If you only obtain a read lock (as opposed to a write lock), then reads and > inserts are still allowed to happen. The new inserted records will not be seen