> -Original Message-
> From: Paul DuBois [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: jueves, 10 de mayo de 2001 6:00
> To: Christian Jaeger; David J. Potter; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Having success with 20 million rows
>
>
> At 11:00 PM +0200 5/9/01, Christian
I would be very intested in finding out more about the hardware being
used here, as well as load on the server (queries/sec, etc.), and maybe
the amount of data (Megabytes, Gigabytes, Terabytes). Twenty million
records is a lot but that number in itself may not give the application
the credit
r; David J. Potter; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Having success with 20 million rows
At 11:00 PM +0200 5/9/01, Christian Jaeger wrote:
>Was the table inaccessible during these 4 days? Or is mysql able to
>still write to the table while it's being altered?
Those are not mutually ex
At 11:00 PM +0200 5/9/01, Christian Jaeger wrote:
>Was the table inaccessible during these 4 days? Or is mysql able to
>still write to the table while it's being altered?
Those are not mutually exclusive possibilities. :-)
According to the manual, reads can be done on the original table while
t
Was the table inaccessible during these 4 days? Or is mysql able to
still write to the table while it's being altered?
Christian.
At 12:08 Uhr -0700 9.5.2001, David J. Potter wrote:
>occur very fast. We use both Windows and Linux. Adding a column is the
>only action that is slow (it took 4 da
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Robert Henkel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "'Joshua J. Kugler'"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 2:03 PM
Subject: RE: Having success with 20 million rows
> I take that back the word not t
Can you put your my.cnf for windows and linux? Will be nice to compare you
setting again others.
TIA,
Ernesto Vargas
- Original Message -
From: "Joshua J. Kugler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 3:49 PM
Subject: Re:
TED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 2:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Having success with 20 million rows
FOUR days!?!? THAT'S patience. But I'm glad to hear the success story.
j- k
On Wednesday 09 May 2001 11:08, David J. Potter wrote:
> Just wanted to say that we a
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Having success with 20 million rows
FOUR days!?!? THAT'S patience. But I'm glad to hear the success story.
j- k
On Wednesday 09 May 2001 11:08, David J. Potter wrote:
> Just wanted to say that we are having success using MySql. Even though
our
FOUR days!?!? THAT'S patience. But I'm glad to hear the success story.
j- k
On Wednesday 09 May 2001 11:08, David J. Potter wrote:
> Just wanted to say that we are having success using MySql. Even though our
> tables are large, over 20 million rows, selects, updates and inserts occur
10 matches
Mail list logo