ot;gerald_clark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Richard Clarke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 8:39 PM
Subject: Re: GET_LOCK(str,timeout) behaviour
> GET_LOCK is just a string lock, and has nothing to do with tables.
> Use L
GET_LOCK is just a string lock, and has nothing to do with tables.
Use LOCK TABLES instead.
Richard Clarke wrote:
The manual indicates that a GET_LOCK expires automatically when a new
GET_LOCK is issued. Can someone explain to me how this behaviour could
possibly be the most useful?
I wish to use
