On Fri, Oct 24, 2003 at 05:04:28PM +1000, Chris wrote:
> They gave up on it eh?
>
> Was that more because of the legal problems that happened, or due
> to BDB and InnoDB continuing to improve and provide better solutions?
Leagal issues, probably.
--
Jeremy D. Zawodny | Perl, Web, MySQL, Lin
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 05:22:07PM -0400, Gabriel Ricard wrote:
> Someone recently asked about Gemini tables on this list and it got me
> curious about what ever happened to that technology... NuSphere still
> seems to exist, and they still sell their PHPEd product along with the
> "NuSphere Tec
Hi!
Thanks to the god of multiversioned databases, creator of InnoDB and
all-round good human being
Heikki, I can tell you the following things with confidence:
1. InnoDB is the fastest disk-based transactional database engine on the
planet, period. No ifs,
no buts, no conditions at all.
2. Inn
Hi!
>> Or should I look at the InnoDB tables (which are still considered beta).
InnoDB tables are classified as gamma by Innobase Oy and MySQL AB. The text
on the MySQL-Max download page is lagging behind (says beta), but to balance
it, on the front page MySQL AB classifies MySQL-Max as stable
On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 10:17:52AM -0600, Scalper wrote:
> I am a new MySQL user, so forgive my stupidity for asking the
> following question (perhaps taboo). What is the latest on NuSphere
> vs MySQL AB? What about Gemini. I have searched everywhere for
> info, but can't seem to find anything
Hi Ashley,
- Original Message -
From: "Ashley M. Kirchner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> While compiling MySQL+Gemini-3.23.41 i received the following error:
> [...]
> System is RedHat 7.1, with their GCC 2.96-85
No idea about Gemini, but we do have an advisory against using gcc 2.96 o
At 9:43 AM +0100 11/22/01, Attila Beno wrote:
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA1
>
>On Thu, 22 Nov 2001, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
>
>> While compiling MySQL+Gemini-3.23.41 i received the following error:
>>
>> System is RedHat 7.1, with their GCC 2.96-85
>
>Same here, altho
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 22 Nov 2001, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
> While compiling MySQL+Gemini-3.23.41 i received the following error:
>
> System is RedHat 7.1, with their GCC 2.96-85
Same here, althogh the binary version starts up fine.
> While I'm on
On Tue, Sep 11, 2001 at 03:29:00PM +0200, Henning Schroeder wrote:
> At 11:03 11.09.01, you wrote:
> > > does MYSQL.COM has a table type same as GEMINI ( GEMINI
> >
> >yes. MySQL contains support for BDB and InnoDB tables, that are
> >transaction-safe.
>
> I don´t want to provoke any anger here,
At 11:03 11.09.01, you wrote:
> > does MYSQL.COM has a table type same as GEMINI ( GEMINI
>
>yes. MySQL contains support for BDB and InnoDB tables, that are
>transaction-safe.
I don´t want to provoke any anger here, maybe i´m still too new on the list.
But actually, i´m a bit sick of the curren
Hi,
> does MYSQL.COM has a table type same as GEMINI ( GEMINI
> does not complies with GPL according to what I read) that support
> the ACID PROPERTIES ( TRANSACTIONS ) (MyIsam, Inodb ?) ...
yes. MySQL contains support for BDB and InnoDB tables, that are
transaction-safe.
if you are downloadin
At 9:20 AM -0600 9/10/01, ROGGER ALEXIS VASQUEZ MARTINEZ wrote:
>Hi :
>First of all I've test for a short period MYSQL, I
>think is great ,,, recently I was navigating MYSQL.COM
>and I found and read about the dispute with MYSQL.ORG
>I enter the site to see what it was ...
>I notice they promote a
Hello.
On Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 09:20:55AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
> What I understand is that MYSQL.COM <> MYSQL.ORG, but
> does MYSQL.COM has a table type same as GEMINI ( GEMINI does not complies
> with GPL according
> to what I read)
> that support the ACID PROPERTIES ( TRANSACTI
On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 11:07:13PM -0400, Paul wrote:
> I've compiled MySQL 3.23.39 with Gemini support. The compile was error
> free although the 'make test' skipped the Gemini tests for some reason. In
> the mysqld.err log from the test directory I see this message:
>
>
Jeremy Zawodny writes:
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 01:19:57PM +0300, Sinisa Milivojevic wrote:
> Does this mean they'll re-appear in the manual as well?
> --
> Jeremy D. Zawodny, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Technical Yahoo - Yahoo Finance
> Desk: (408) 349-7878 Fax: (408) 349-5454 Cell: (408) 685-593
On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 01:19:57PM +0300, Sinisa Milivojevic wrote:
>
> Yes, in 3.23.41 source tarball only.
>
> We will not put Gemini tables in our binaries due to several reasons
> of which stability is just one.
Does this mean they'll re-appear in the manual as well?
--
Jeremy D. Zawodny,
Pete Kuczynski writes:
> Hi,
> since Nusphere release the source code for gemini yesterday I believe it
> was, I was wondering if Mysql AB was going to incorporate it into a
> future release if it's database.
>
> I realise in light of recent .org events
>
>
> Pete
> --
> __
17 matches
Mail list logo
