Re: --replicate* question

2004-03-24 Thread Egor Egorov
Egor Egorov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Chua Choon Keng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> What about using binlog-do-db=database_name >> option? In this case only updates will be logged if >> the current database is database_name >> >> What if I only wish to replicate a few tables of a >> database?

Re: --replicate* question

2004-03-24 Thread Egor Egorov
Chua Choon Keng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> What about using binlog-do-db=database_name > option? In this case only updates will be logged if > the current database is database_name > > What if I only wish to replicate a few tables of a > database? Using binlog-do-db=database_name does > limit t

Re: --replicate* question

2004-03-23 Thread Chua Choon Keng
> What about using binlog-do-db=database_name option? In this case only updates will be logged if the current database is database_name What if I only wish to replicate a few tables of a database? Using binlog-do-db=database_name does limit to this particular database but there is no binlog-ignore

Re: --replicate* question

2004-03-23 Thread Egor Egorov
Chua Choon Keng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dear all, > > I am new to mysql replication. I know how to use > the --replicate* options but I would like to know > whether the options act as filter on the master or > on the slave... On the slave. > > From the documentation, it says: > "The --rep