Neil Zanella wrote:
>On Mon, 26 Nov 2001, Ken Kinder wrote:
>> Oracle is certainly more full-featured, but if you know very little
about
>> databases, Oracle is not the right choice.
I agree. First of all the system requirements are high.
>For instance the Oracle Universal Installer took someth
On Monday 26 Nov 2001 20:00, Neil Zanella wrote:
> Now there is one thing that we must be aware of. There are things that
> mysql does not support (yet). These include foreign keys, views,
> subselects, triggers, and procedural SQL, and I can't remember
> if mySQL supports transaction processing e
On Mon, 26 Nov 2001, Ken Kinder wrote:
> Oracle is certainly more full-featured, but if you know very little about
> databases, Oracle is not the right choice.
I agree. First of all the system requirements are high. For instance the
Oracle Universal Installer took something like three hours on
Novembro de 2001 15:46
To: Mamun Murtaza Sheriff; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: opinion - voating
Oracle is certainly more full-featured, but if you know very little about
databases, Oracle is not the right choice. Only use Oracle if you have a
full-time fix-figure-salary Oracle expert AND you
Oracle is certainly more full-featured, but if you know very little about
databases, Oracle is not the right choice. Only use Oracle if you have a
full-time fix-figure-salary Oracle expert AND you actually need Oracle's
features.
If you don't specifically know you need Oracle, you don't.
On W
At 12:45 PM -0500 11/21/01, Auri Net SAC wrote:
>Hi
>
>it is possible
>
>"select * from table where col1 <= now and col2>=now"
>
>where col1 and col2 are date type
>
>thnaks
Yes, except that it should be now() rather than now.
-
Hi
it is possible
"select * from table where col1 <= now and col2>=now"
where col1 and col2 are date type
thnaks
-
Before posting, please check:
http://www.mysql.com/manual.php (the manual)
http://lists.mysql.com/
