.com
Subject: Re: mysql performance / ndb 5.1 performance
Moritz Möller wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> there are about 2GB free, so the net size would still be 32 GB.
>
> The queries are really optimized, >99.9% of all queries can be satisfied
> without table scans.
>
> Well, I guess I h
Moritz Möller wrote:
Hi Dan,
there are about 2GB free, so the net size would still be 32 GB.
The queries are really optimized, >99.9% of all queries can be satisfied
without table scans.
Well, I guess I have to give NDB a chance, I hope it will help. The only
alternative I come to is to cluste
What exactly is the performance problem you are seeing?
Have you checked to make sure all your memory is being utilized? ie,
not just grabbed by MySQL, but actually in use?
-Sheeri
On 5/24/06, Dan Trainor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Moritz Möller wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> there are about 2GB free,
Moritz Möller wrote:
Hi Dan,
there are about 2GB free, so the net size would still be 32 GB.
The queries are really optimized, >99.9% of all queries can be satisfied
without table scans.
Well, I guess I have to give NDB a chance, I hope it will help. The only
alternative I come to is to cluste
Hi Dan,
there are about 2GB free, so the net size would still be 32 GB.
The queries are really optimized, >99.9% of all queries can be satisfied
without table scans.
Well, I guess I have to give NDB a chance, I hope it will help. The only
alternative I come to is to cluster the database on appli
