RE: engine is now innoDB instead of MyISAM.

2012-04-30 Thread Rick James
e- > From: Claudio Nanni [mailto:claudio.na...@gmail.com] > Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2012 6:31 AM > To: Brown, Charles > Cc: mysql@lists.mysql.com > Subject: RE: engine is now innoDB instead of MyISAM. > > Charles, > > I think going back to MyISAM as default is a good

Re: engine is now innoDB instead of MyISAM.

2012-04-29 Thread Brown, Charles
Well said. Thanks so much. Sent from my iPhone On Apr 29, 2012, at 8:02 AM, "Reindl Harald" wrote: > > > Am 29.04.2012 14:50, schrieb Brown: >> is a complain I received from one of my developer that after following our >> MySQL >> Cluster migration, tables are now defaulting to innodb (how

RE: engine is now innoDB instead of MyISAM.

2012-04-29 Thread Claudio Nanni
iliates. Other names may be trademarks of their respective > > owners. > > > > Type 'help;' or '\h' for help. Type '\c' to clear the current input > statement. > > > > mysql> > > > > &

Re: engine is now innoDB instead of MyISAM.

2012-04-29 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 29.04.2012 14:50, schrieb Brown: > is a complain I received from one of my developer that after following our > MySQL > Cluster migration, tables are now defaulting to innodb (how can he tell) as already said: the builtin default has changed an you have to configure MyISAM as default your

RE: engine is now innoDB instead of MyISAM.

2012-04-29 Thread Brown, Charles
are parameters that have sustain me over the years. Now, I'm doing MySql Cluster are they any more relevant. Best regards, From: Claudio Nanni [mailto:claudio.na...@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2012 4:29 AM To: Brown, Charles Cc: mysql@lists.mysql.com Subject: Re: engine is now

Re: engine is now innoDB instead of MyISAM.

2012-04-29 Thread Claudio Nanni
t > statement. > > ** ** > > mysql> > > ** ** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > *From:* Claudio Nanni [mailto:claudio.na...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Saturday, April 28, 2012 2:48 PM > *To:* Brown, Charles > *Cc:* mysql@lists.mysql.com &g

Re: engine is now innoDB instead of MyISAM.

2012-04-28 Thread Claudio Nanni
; From: Reindl Harald [mailto:h.rei...@thelounge.net] > Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2012 3:01 AM > To: mysql@lists.mysql.com > Subject: Re: engine is now innoDB instead of MyISAM. > > > > Am 28.04.2012 09:00, schrieb Brown: > > We recently switched from MySQL community to Mysql

RE: engine is now innoDB instead of MyISAM.

2012-04-28 Thread Brown, Charles
Harald [mailto:h.rei...@thelounge.net] Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2012 3:01 AM To: mysql@lists.mysql.com Subject: Re: engine is now innoDB instead of MyISAM. Am 28.04.2012 09:00, schrieb Brown: > We recently switched from MySQL community to Mysql clustered using Oracle > supported MySQl. The p

Re: engine is now innoDB instead of MyISAM.

2012-04-28 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 28.04.2012 09:00, schrieb Brown: > We recently switched from MySQL community to Mysql clustered using Oracle > supported MySQl. The problem is, during our testing phase, we observed the > default engine is now innoDB instead of MyISAM. Any thoughts on that? We're > not getting the performan