iginal Message -
> From: "Dan Rossi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Victoria Reznichenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 11:04 PM
> Subject: RE: RE: MySql 4.1 Sub Selects
>
>
> > damn , i read it was
ot; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 12:02 AM
Subject: RE: RE: MySql 4.1 Sub Selects and not stored procedures
> I'm not sure where you're getting your information ("Typically, db vendors
> recommend you use an exists clause,
0:0:02
Arthur
-Original Message-
From: Greg Matthews [mailto:greg55@;ozemail.com.au]
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 7:38 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: RE: MySql 4.1 Sub Selects and not stored procedures
hey, can i hijack my message back?...this thread is about the perform
aid is null
Thanks,
Greg.
- Original Message -
From: "Dan Rossi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Victoria Reznichenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 11:04 PM
Subject: RE: RE: MySql 4.1 Sub Selects
> damn , i read it
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 11:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: re: RE: MySql 4.1 Sub Selects
daniel,
Monday, November 11, 2002, 3:51:25 AM, you wrote:
d> will 4.1 hopefully have stored procedure functionality ?
Nope.
Stored procedures will be implemented around v5.0
--
For t
daniel,
Monday, November 11, 2002, 3:51:25 AM, you wrote:
d> will 4.1 hopefully have stored procedure functionality ?
Nope.
Stored procedures will be implemented around v5.0
--
For technical support contracts, goto https://order.mysql.com/?ref=ensita
This email is sponsored by Ensita.net http:
