Re: NuSphere v. MySQL 4

2002-03-02 Thread Michael Widenius
Hi! > "martinG" == martin tunggorono <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: martinG> Thanks for the article it is definitely helpful and narrow down my choice. martinG> Anything against the 4.0 MAX here? MySQL 4.0.1 max should be quite safe to use Note that as InnodB is already included in the stand

RE: NuSphere v. MySQL 4

2002-02-27 Thread Britt Johnston
gren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 3:25 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: NuSphere v. MySQL 4 > > > > > > I suggest you use MySQL from MySQL AB. Progress Software (parent of > >

RE: NuSphere v. MySQL 4

2002-02-27 Thread Britt Johnston
gt; Subject: Re: NuSphere v. MySQL 4 > > > I suggest you use MySQL from MySQL AB. Progress Software (parent of > NuSphere), is having some legal troubles. > > http://www.newsforge.com/article.pl?sid=02/02/26/1825200 > > Tyler > > - Original Message - > F

Re: NuSphere v. MySQL 4

2002-02-26 Thread martin . tunggorono
| | Subject: Re: NuSphere v. MySQL 4 | >--| I suggest you use MySQL from MySQL AB. Progress

Re: NuSphere v. MySQL 4

2002-02-26 Thread Tyler Longren
2002 1:01 PM Subject: NuSphere v. MySQL 4 > Hello, > > I'm not sure if this list is appropriate for this issue but I'll go ahead > ask for your input anyway. We're trying to decide to choose DBMS as a > backend of our web portal. The portal will take online orders an

NuSphere v. MySQL 4

2002-02-26 Thread martin . tunggorono
Hello, I'm not sure if this list is appropriate for this issue but I'll go ahead ask for your input anyway. We're trying to decide to choose DBMS as a backend of our web portal. The portal will take online orders and other requests from end users and this is going to be available enterprise wide