"William Goedicke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The broader feature set of Postgres over MySQL doesn't get a lot of
> intelligent rebuttal.
True. Fortunately, many web projects don't need triggers, subselects, etc.
(and PostgreSQL is IMHO a little more difficult to manage). In those cases
speed
Dear Kevin -
Kevin Pratt writes:
>
> "IMO - mysql is just a disaster you are inviting on yourself.
Isn't there some line about everyone having an opinion...
> you should see the responses to some recent bug reports ...
>
> We have run load tests ourselves, and postgres performs much the
: "Kevin Pratt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Mysql List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 6:42 PM
Subject: MySQL vs SQLServer vs PostgresSQL
> Dear Kevin -
>
> (I can't resist the obvious quip.)
>
> Kevin Pratt writes:
>
> &
Dear Kevin -
(I can't resist the obvious quip.)
Kevin Pratt writes:
> I have heard mysql is the access for unix...
Yes, like emacs is the notepad for unix.
Yours (in gentle jest) - Billy
-
Before posting, please c
Kevin Pratt wrote:
>
> I have heard mysql is the access for unix... i would like to hear about
> comparisons with Mysql SqlServer and PostgresSQL
>
> Kevin
differences are in the archives for this list as well as on the mysql.com
list.
Mysql doesn't compare will to Access. access is simply a
I have heard mysql is the access for unix... i would like to hear about
comparisons with Mysql SqlServer and PostgresSQL
Kevin
-
Before posting, please check:
http://www.mysql.com/manual.php (the manual)
http://lists.m
