On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 12:54:33PM +0100, Robert Sundström wrote:
>
> I have done some admittedly not-so-scientific testing on MySQL (both
> with MyISAM and InnoDB) to find that both combinations performs best
> in single user systems.
That shouldn't surprise anyone. There little if any content
On Thu, 2001-12-13 at 03:54, Robert Sundström wrote:
> queries, with medium sized transactions (3-5 statements per transaction,
> where transactions was supported). On my regular desktop box I was able to
> get about 700 statements per second using MyISAM and about two thirds of
> that using In
Robert,
>-Original Message-
>From: Robert Sundstrvm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: quinta-feira, 13 de Dezembro de 2001 11:55To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: MySQL v.s. Oracle
>At 04:23 2001-12-02 , you wrote:
>>Not sure that total users is a good metric; quer
Robert Sundström writes:
>
> Most stable commercial products exposes the opposite behavior. It may be
> the case that MySQL performs pretty well in single (or few) user cases, but
> the commercial alternatives will, in my experience, in most cases beat
> MySQL on 3-5 users and above.
>
Only
pound!
-Original Message-
From: Robert Sundstrvm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: quinta-feira, 13 de Dezembro de 2001 11:55
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: MySQL v.s. Oracle
At 04:23 2001-12-02 , you wrote:
>Not sure that total users is a good metric; queries per second may be
>better.
>
At 04:23 2001-12-02 , you wrote:
>Not sure that total users is a good metric; queries per second may be
>better.
>
>We host web sites and use MySQL with MyISAM tables for small and
>medium-sized sites, Oracle for the big ones. Oracle's row-level locking
>abilities make a big, deciding difference f
we may be using'em in place of Oracle
for most sites.
Thanks,
--Walt Weaver
Bozeman, Montana
-Original Message-
From: Philip Mak
To: MySQL Mailing List
Sent: 11/30/2001 8:59 PM
Subject: MySQL v.s. Oracle
Hi all,
We are currently using MySQL for our database driven website. Currently
> We are currently using MySQL for our database driven website. Currently,
> we have about 100,000 users. In January, we will be getting 2 million
> new registered users on our website.
Yes, but how many hits are you expecting, and what sort of queries will be
ran?
> We're buying a $50,000 Sun
Hi!
Look at the InnoDB/MySQL user stories at http://www.innodb.com
1200 queries per second on a single processor Intel box is easy to attain. A
terabyte of data is handled at an InnoDB/MySQL site.
InnoDB is close to Oracle in architecture.
Regards,
Heikki
http://www.innodb.com
--
Order commer
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 9:59 PM
To: MySQL Mailing List
Subject: MySQL v.s. Oracle
Hi all,
We are currently using MySQL for our database driven website. Currently,
we have about 100,000 users. In January, we will be getting 2 million
new registered users on our website.
We&#x
Hi all,
We are currently using MySQL for our database driven website. Currently,
we have about 100,000 users. In January, we will be getting 2 million new
registered users on our website.
We're buying a $50,000 Sun box to run the database server on. We're
deciding whether we should switch to Ora
11 matches
Mail list logo
