Re: InnoDB locking: Different behavior on 3.23.55 and 4.0.13

2003-07-25 Thread Info
Estoy tomando el sol . q -- MySQL General Mailing List For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: InnoDB locking: Different behavior on 3.23.55 and 4.0.13

2003-07-25 Thread Info
Estoy tomando el sol . q -- MySQL General Mailing List For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: InnoDB locking: Different behavior on 3.23.55 and 4.0.13

2003-07-24 Thread Mikhail Entaltsev
m forwarding this to Sanja. IMHO current behaviour is absolutly correct. Mikhail. - Original Message - From: "Heikki Tuuri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 11:43 PM Subject: Re: InnoDB locking: Different behavior on 3.23.55

Re: InnoDB locking: Different behavior on 3.23.55 and 4.0.13

2003-07-24 Thread Heikki Tuuri
Message - From: ""Mikhail Entaltsev"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Newsgroups: mailing.database.mysql Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 3:44 PM Subject: InnoDB locking: Different behavior on 3.23.55 and 4.0.13 > --=_NextPart_000_0119_01C351F2.03137C50 > Content-Typ

InnoDB locking: Different behavior on 3.23.55 and 4.0.13

2003-07-24 Thread Mikhail Entaltsev
Hi I have 2 MySQL servers: Server1 is 3.23.55-max-log Server2 is 4.0.13-standard-log Let's assume that we have 2 connections (Conn1 and Conn2) and table test: CREATE TABLE `test` ( `id` int(3) NOT NULL auto_increment, `name` char(