RE: Bug in ORDER BY

2003-02-18 Thread Steven Roussey
I'm glad you found the problem! Sorry my suggestion did not work. I'm still confused on why you have quotes around the field names in the order by part of the query, though. All the best! -steve- - Before posting, please chec

re: Bug in ORDER BY

2003-02-18 Thread Victoria Reznichenko
On Monday 17 February 2003 21:06, Ken Goff wrote: > I have encountered what appears to be a bug in MySQL regarding ORDER > BY related to a date field when also used in conjunction with > DATE_FORMAT() or UNIX_TIMESTAMP(). When these functions are applied > to my date field, MySQL ignores any includ

RE: Bug in ORDER BY

2003-02-17 Thread Steven Roussey
> SELECT * FROM EventList ORDER BY 'EventDate', 'EventOrder' LIMIT 50; I'm surprised you happened to get anything in order. Maybe the message got simplified by the list manager, but did you really mean to order by a constant string? Why not: SELECT * FROM EventList ORDER BY `EventDate`, `

Bug in ORDER BY

2003-02-17 Thread Ken Goff
I have encountered what appears to be a bug in MySQL regarding ORDER BY related to a date field when also used in conjunction with DATE_FORMAT() or UNIX_TIMESTAMP(). When these functions are applied to my date field, MySQL ignores any included ORDER BY within the query. I first noticed this bug

Re:Possible bug in ORDER BY timestamp

2001-10-18 Thread Lael Griffith
Thanks for the help everyone. I tried changing the type to Œtimestamp¹ and that did not fix the problem, however when I changed the type to Œint¹ and it worked as it was suppose to. Thanks, Lael

Serious bug in order by

2001-03-12 Thread Sasha Pachev
I have just been able to repeat a bug in a rather simple ORDER BY queries that was introduced in 3.23.34. I wonder how in the world our test suite managed to miss it. We should have a fix shortly and as soon as it is available, will post a patch and will also release 3.23.35. Which reminds us