I wrote:
> I'll try to confirm this tomorrow at work However, it's a really
> strange and annoying behaviour. Nowhere in the documentation is stated
> something like that, and 3.23 was fine about it. Is it a bug ?
Confirming this on my box at work. With 4.0.2-alpha : 0.08 sec overhead
with r
Hi again,
> > Do you use so huge queries that you really need sort_buffer=64M and
> > record_buffer=32M? Don't forget that record_buffer and sort_buffer are
> > specified per-thread.
Well, some further input about this as I've just tried at home
(MySQL 4.0.1-alpha-nt). You seem to be righ
