RE: Unusual Date Query

2003-10-10 Thread Ross Davis - DataAnywhere.net
That will only return the number of rows in "Table1" What I want to return 1 to n rows based on the number of days between date1 and daten with each row having the date filled in. Ross Davis DataAnywhere.net 250-470-9192 ChaletsOnline.com is coming soon Don't you des

Unusual Date Query

2003-10-10 Thread Ross Davis - DataAnywhere.net
I want know if there is a way to return every date between 2 date ranges regardless if there is a row in a table. I have a table that contains daily pricing information and I want to be able to do a mass updated/insert records. I know how to write the updates/inserts if I have table that contains

RE: Design feature or bug

2003-01-14 Thread Ross Davis - DataAnywhere.net
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 6:18 PM > To: Ross Davis - DataAnywhere.net > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Design feature or bug > > > On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 04:41:53PM -0800, Ross Davis - > DataAnywhere.net wrote: > > > > > &

RE: Design feature or bug

2003-01-14 Thread Ross Davis - DataAnywhere.net
> -Original Message- > From: Jeremy Zawodny [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 4:00 PM > To: Ross Davis - DataAnywhere.net > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Design feature or bug > > > On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 0

Design feature or bug

2003-01-14 Thread Ross Davis - DataAnywhere.net
I have a 3.23.53 server that is a slave of another 3.25.52 server. Master has 2 databases on it. On the slave only only one of the databases is replicated. If I reference the table database that is not on the slave during an insert or something on the server it crashes the slave! Shouldn't the

RE: innofb foreign keys problem

2003-01-14 Thread Ross Davis - DataAnywhere.net
I agree with you. If there is no index already on the referenced fields then add one. By adding a foreign key you are already altering the table why not just finish the job. -Original Message- From: Natale Babbo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 8:58 AM To: Oka

RE: Replication bug?

2003-01-13 Thread Ross Davis - DataAnywhere.net
I don't think I have anything that should cause this. Here is my my.ini from the the slave. The tables that are being excluded are not listed. [mysqld] basedir=C:/mysql datadir=C:/mysql/data set-variable=max_allowed_packet=16M log-slave-updates log-bin # Replication variables master-host=x.

RE: Replication bug?

2003-01-12 Thread Ross Davis - DataAnywhere.net
From: Frederick R. Doncillo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2003 10:58 PM To: Ross Davis - DataAnywhere.net Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Replication bug? Are the slaves doing the replication process? If not, you may try it that way. Slaves should do the updating and

RE: Replication bug?

2003-01-12 Thread Ross Davis - DataAnywhere.net
Did you ever get any confirmation that it will be added to the official bug list? -Original Message- From: Jason Brooke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, January 12, 2003 3:14 AM To: Ross Davis - DataAnywhere.net Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Replication bug? Yes this is

Replication bug?

2003-01-11 Thread Ross Davis - DataAnywhere.net
I think I have found a replication bug. We are using Mysql-Max 3.23.53 in a master and multiple slave situation. That is working fine. We are using InnoDB We have found a workaround to the problem but I thought you should know about it. We have 2 databases on the system call them dba and dbb.

Best MySQL version for replication

2002-10-14 Thread Ross Davis - DataAnywhere.net
I am about to setup the following server layout using all Windows 2000 Server and XP Pro machines. Master Server-| |--Branch Office Server -| ||- Machine 1 ||...