RE: missing data after partitioning an existing table

2014-05-23 Thread Roland RoLaNd
May2015 VALUES LESS THAN > (TO_DAYS('2015-06-01')), PARTITION Jun2015 VALUES LESS THAN > (TO_DAYS('2015-07-01')), PARTITION Jul2015 VALUES LESS THAN > (TO_DAYS('2015-08-01')), PARTITION Aug2015 VALUES LESS THAN > (TO_DAYS('2015-09-01&#

RE: missing data after partitioning an existing table

2014-05-23 Thread Roland RoLaNd
SERT INTO p3_dna_new SELECT * FROM p3_dna_old; It finishes after a while, with absolutely no error nor warning. if i issue the following: select count(*) from p3_dna_new; it will be different than the result of select count(*) from p3_dna_old; If there's an issue, shouldn'

missing data after partitioning an existing table

2014-05-23 Thread Roland RoLaNd
I know a couple of things, but table partitioning isn't one of them. i have a 35 GB sized table which is causing performance issues, my research came across partitioning, which is what i tried and failed with today. i tried altering the table, that kept going for 2 hours with absolutely no chang

Database lock on mysql import - Information

2012-09-10 Thread Roland RoLaNd
Dear all, I realize this is a very newbie question so bear with me please. I know that when you import/export a DB its tables are locked to ensure consistency and no data corruption. but why would other DBs on the same server get locked if im importing/exporting one DB ? in other words: expo

killing mysqldump

2012-05-31 Thread Roland Roland
Is it safe to kill a mysqldump while it's in process ? i mean aside loosing the dumped file, would it affect the running DB being dumped? -- MySQL General Mailing List For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/mysql

Re: Best practice to minimize DB server performance effect (large query)

2012-05-31 Thread Roland Roland
i agree it wouldn't cause trouble, though it might lock mysql as there's a number of other databases running on the same server. so performance is an issue even if it's just a CPU/RAM peak. On 5/31/12 11:23 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 31.05.2012 09:13, schrieb Roland RoLa

Best practice to minimize DB server performance effect (large query)

2012-05-31 Thread Roland RoLaNd
Dear all,I have a task to anonymize data in 82000 record (for the time being)i've tested my script against about 30 of them, and it takes about 2.4 sec for each query to be executed. i'm seeking help with the following: - what's the best way to run such a script without affecting the DB server