Re: some problem of InnoDB performance optimization

2010-03-22 Thread Peter Zaitsev
requires updates to be serializable to work. > > > Can give problems for portable applications if you port from MySQL-4.0 to > later > > What's the meaning about this sentence? > > > This means you can run into the problems if you upgrade from MySQL 4.0 to later ve

Re: MySQL Load Balancing

2006-08-07 Thread Peter Zaitsev
Ed Pauley II wrote: Continuent's m/cluster will not work for me as it does not allow replication across a WAN. We have an offsite backup that needs to be in the replication (2-way to make switching back and forth easy) chain. I am thinking of a master, slave setup at each location where

Re: Text search + transactions?

2006-08-07 Thread Peter Zaitsev
On Mon, 2006-08-07 at 09:49 +0100, Lexington Luthor wrote: > Peter Zaitsev wrote: > > Hi, > > > > One of approaches is to have "shadow" MyISAM table in addition to your > > Innodb table to perform full text search, which you can update in bulks >

Re: maximum files size for longblob - what is bigger?

2006-08-07 Thread Peter Zaitsev
ize which is 16M by default. I would be very careful using blobs larger than 100MB. MySQL will need some 3 times of this size of memory allocated on the server for blob processing. -- Peter Zaitsev, MySQL Performance Expert MySQL Performance Blog - http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com My

Re: Text search + transactions?

2006-08-07 Thread Peter Zaitsev
"shadow" MyISAM table in addition to your Innodb table to perform full text search, which you can update in bulks or via triggers. You also can try sphinx: http://www.sphinxsearch.com/ which works with any storage engine and also much faster. -- Peter Zaitsev, MySQL Performance

Re: MySQL Load Balancing

2006-08-04 Thread Peter Zaitsev
ight want to kick it up. For very basic setup you even can use DNS for load balancing, which does not solve many of the problems describe. The same kind of simple load balancing is build in MySQL JDBC Driver. In general everyone seems to implement something on their own, working well for the

Re: MySQL 5.0 25% slower

2006-02-24 Thread Peter Zaitsev
--+--++-+ > > #>free > total used free sharedbuffers cached > Mem: 3116424 3110228 6196 0 412922528564 > -/+ buffers/cache: 5403722576052 > Swap: 10

Re: MySQL not using optimum disk throughput.

2005-05-31 Thread Peter Zaitsev
binary compiled on SuSE SLES is known to crash on RH AS in some cases. We have great adoption of opteron platform among our customers with great success rate, so I'm quite surprised by extent of problems you're having. -- Peter Zaitsev, Senior Performance Engineer MySQL AB, w

Re: MySQL not using optimum disk throughput.

2005-05-06 Thread Peter Zaitsev
h I assume means I'm now running deadline. Is there any other way > > to find out?) > > > > And no performance diff. Note that you're benchmarks only show a 20M > > addition overhead. We're about 60x too slow for these drives so I'm not >

Re: MySQL not using optimum disk throughput.

2005-05-06 Thread Peter Zaitsev
he line (16K for Innodb tables) The thing is by default many RAID controllers would put cacheline size = stripe size, some may not even allow to change it. If it is the case MySQL will have to read a lot of unnecessary data which will kill performance. -- Peter Zaitsev, Senior Performance E

Re: CREATE performance degradation from 4.0.17 -> 4.0.20

2004-08-04 Thread Peter Zaitsev
n_MANY_tables 59 1110 10 > > > Column A is MySQL 3.23.58 > Column B is MySQL 4.0.15 > Column C is MySQL 4.0.16 > Column D is MySQL 4.0.17 > Column E is MySQL 4.0.20 > > > The biggest problem is the create set. That's a HUGE difference in the >

New version of sql-bench is available from BitKeeper

2004-03-16 Thread Peter Zaitsev
new test cases -- Peter Zaitsev, Senior Support Engineer MySQL AB, www.mysql.com Meet the MySQL Team at User Conference 2004! (April 14-16, Orlando,FL) http://www.mysql.com/uc2004/ -- MySQL General Mailing List For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql To unsubscribe:http://lists.m

Re: Benchmarking/optimization of MySQL

2004-03-02 Thread Peter Zaitsev
ese (and other) differences come from? > > > PS: I would be very pleased if I could see hardware description / my.cnf / > sql-bench results from you to see if I am on the right way and how much > headroom do I still have. (Currently my "run-all-tests" script finishes wit

Re: Table Name Case Sensitivity

2004-02-23 Thread Peter Zaitsev
; > I get - Unknown system variable 'lower_case_table_names' > This is startup option. Did you use it as such (in my.cnf) ? -- Peter Zaitsev, Senior Support Engineer MySQL AB, www.mysql.com Meet the MySQL Team at User Conference 2004! (April 14-16, Orlando,FL) http://www.mysql.c

Re: Indexing Woes

2004-02-11 Thread Peter Zaitsev
ou shall be able to make Repair happening by Sort unless it is unique index, which is much faster. -- Peter Zaitsev, Senior Support Engineer MySQL AB, www.mysql.com Meet the MySQL Team at User Conference 2004! (April 14-16, Orlando,FL) http://www.mysql.com/uc2004/ -- MySQL General Mailing List

Re: Maximum tables in a join (4.0.x)

2004-02-10 Thread Peter Zaitsev
says 31: http://www.mysql.com/information/crash-me.php?res_id=49 , > search for "tables in join". One can get 63 by Recompiling MySQL if it helps. -- Peter Zaitsev, Senior Support Engineer MySQL AB, www.mysql.com Meet the MySQL Team at User Conference 2004! (April 14-16, Orlando,FL)

Re: SQL2000 and MySql

2004-02-10 Thread Peter Zaitsev
t backup. As Innob has versioning these selects will not lock anything. -- Peter Zaitsev, Senior Support Engineer MySQL AB, www.mysql.com Meet the MySQL Team at User Conference 2004! (April 14-16, Orlando,FL) http://www.mysql.com/uc2004/ -- MySQL General Mailing List For list archives:

Re: MySQL benchmarks

2004-01-13 Thread Peter Zaitsev
ter this month) Ranger could you please send to Ram our current version ? You can also try OSDB - AS3AP implementation in C. P.S For benchmarks issues it is better to use [EMAIL PROTECTED] list which is dedicated for this purpose. -- Peter Zaitsev, Full-Time Developer MySQL AB, www.mysql.com

Re: optimizer bug in the index used by mysql/Innodb in the search

2003-03-19 Thread Peter Zaitsev
I would recommend you to posting your message to most appropriate mailing list instead of both. Many users are subscribed to both mailing list and they will get your message twice. -- MySQL 2003 Users Conf. -> http://www.mysql.com/events/uc2003/ __ ___ ___ __ / |/ /_ __/

Re: MySQL 4.0.5(a) is released

2002-11-29 Thread Peter Zaitsev
if you need user which can see all databases you can grant him SHOW_DATABASE privelege. So ISPs should be only happy with this change :) -- __ ___ ___ __ / |/ /_ __/ __/ __ \/ /Mr. Peter Zaitsev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> / /|_/ / // /\ \/ /_/ / /__ MySQL A

Re: BUG report (select distinct...) 4.0.2 and latest bk snapshot

2002-07-23 Thread Peter Zaitsev
source of the problem and if problem persist upload them into secret directory at ftp://support.mysql.com If you are able to create small repeatable case you may send it in the mail. -- __ ___ ___ __ / |/ /_ __/ __/ __ \/ /Mr. Peter Zaitsev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> / /|_/

Re: declining insertion speed of large amounts of data

2002-06-06 Thread Peter Zaitsev
read large volumes of data across server farm. I hope this solutions will help you. I'm sure you're going to benchmark them. Could you please post results into the list so all customers will see which benefit they may get. -- For technical support contracts, visit https://order.m

Re: Very large BLOBS in MySQL 4.0.1

2002-03-30 Thread Peter Zaitsev
Hello Adriano, Friday, March 29, 2002, 11:38:32 PM, you wrote: As I remember there are max_allowed_packet options exists both for client and server. You may wish to try to raise both of them. AM> I've been using a perl script to insert a very large blob (up to about 8 AM> MB) into a DB succes

Re[2]: DRDB vs. MySQL replication

2002-03-30 Thread Peter Zaitsev
Hello Jeremy, Friday, March 29, 2002, 3:10:35 AM, you wrote: >> Also a good thing with DRBD you will not have to store and track >> replication log files and the setup will not require to take MySQL >> down to copy the snapshot of database. JZ> Why would you need to take down MySQL for a back

Re: Backups

2002-03-29 Thread Peter Zaitsev
Hello Tab, Friday, March 29, 2002, 10:05:20 PM, you wrote: Which table type do you use ? Well if you do not know it's probably MYISAM. In this case you may use BACKUP TABLE to make a quick consistent backup of the table. If you want to have consistent snapshot of several tables you may use "loc

Re: CPU - hog / hangup with replication

2002-03-29 Thread Peter Zaitsev
Hello Michael, Friday, March 29, 2002, 10:22:27 PM, you wrote: MZ> Hello all, MZ> sorry, if I nerve you with a problem, which is allready known - MZ> I didn't find appropr. info in the FAQs (or was too stupid to look MZ> at the right place?) MZ> Trying database replication with cross-wise upda

Re[4]: RH 7.2 connections problems w 16 web servers to 2 MySQL servers

2002-03-28 Thread Peter Zaitsev
hread package. Therefore this packages are not quite well tested with mysql yet. SI> - Sam. SI> On Monday, March 11, 2002, at 06:06 AM, Peter Zaitsev wrote: >> Hello Michael, >> >> Monday, March 11, 2002, 3:38:28 PM, you wrote: >> >> >> I had a close proble

Re: DRDB vs. MySQL replication

2002-03-27 Thread Peter Zaitsev
Hello Jens, Wednesday, March 27, 2002, 2:43:22 PM, you wrote: We have tried to use DRBD with MySQL/EXT3/NFS and some other applications. Generally it works rather good, showing rather nice performance. The only problem we had was problem with EXT3 corruption, which was in earlier (2-3 months)

MYSQL & NGPT

2002-03-23 Thread Peter Zaitsev
Hello mysql, I've found benchmark for MySQL on Linux with NGPT - the Solaris-like pthread compatible threads for Linux, the stable version 1.2.0 of which just was released. The user tested mysql server from binary distribution vs self compiled with NGPT. 2.4.19-pre3 kernel was used.

MYSQL,Linux & large threads number

2002-03-15 Thread Peter Zaitsev
Hello mysql, Some time ago I wrote about slow down of mysql with large number of threads, which is quite common in Linux-Apache-Mysql-PHP enviroment. The test was simulating the worst case of concurrency - all the threads are modified global variable in a loop 500 times in total, u

Re[2]: RH 7.2 connections problems w 16 web servers to 2 MySQL servers

2002-03-11 Thread Peter Zaitsev
Hello Michael, Monday, March 11, 2002, 3:38:28 PM, you wrote: I had a close problem once - then having many active connections (and so threads) mysql speed may degrade a lot because of scheduling and convergency problem. This does not explain the mysql lock itself, but may be the reason (i.e t

Re[2]: Innodb/Replication problems.

2002-01-06 Thread Peter Zaitsev
Hello Heikki, Saturday, January 05, 2002, 11:55:02 PM, you wrote: >>Hello mysql, >> >> I'm using mysql 3.23.47 with Innodb and trying to play around with >> replication. The replication options are default. >> >> I got one table content occasionally deleted on slave, and note what HT> Who

Innodb/Replication problems.

2002-01-05 Thread Peter Zaitsev
Hello mysql, I'm using mysql 3.23.47 with Innodb and trying to play around with replication. The replication options are default. I got one table content occasionally deleted on slave, and note what this did not stop the replication: The inserts are successfully passed, therefore the u

Re[2]: Mysql reconnect hang

2002-01-03 Thread Peter Zaitsev
Hello Sinisa, Wednesday, January 02, 2002, 6:21:59 PM, you wrote: No. This happens then mysql is completely restarted. I Understand this should not happen but somehow it does. >> I've found the following problem often happens to me: >> Then mysqld restarted unclear (sigsegv or server reset) t

Mysql reconnect hang

2002-01-01 Thread Peter Zaitsev
Hello mysql, I've found the following problem often happens to me: Then mysqld restarted unclear (sigsegv or server reset) the mysql client library may hang during the automatic reconnect. The backtrace is similar to this and does not changes other time (at least 2 hours is not enough for it)

Bug report mysql 3.23.45

2001-12-10 Thread Peter Zaitsev
Hello mysql, Running Linux 2.4.x SMP/innodb. This query works OK. mysql> explain SELECT cp.counter_id, tg.tbl, cs.host -> FROM counter.table_groups AS tg, counter.counterproperty AS cp, counter.servers AS cs -> WHERE tg.tblid=cp.tblid AND tg.server=1 AND cs.SERVER_ID=tg.server lim

Re[2]: innodb and use of indices

2001-11-26 Thread Peter Zaitsev
Hello Heikki, Wednesday, November 21, 2001, 8:34:13 PM, you wrote: I see some more users are interested in optimize table to work. Why don't you just map OPTIMIZE TABLE to ALTER TABLE for INNODB tables so user may not care about table type, there currently one should check the table type and use

Heap tables & replication

2001-10-01 Thread Peter Zaitsev
Hello mysql, Could anyone tell me if heap tables are cyrrently working with replication. As I remember some time ago you might get problems then server restarts (so empty it's heap tables) there fore slave does not and so it gets dublicate key errors on inserts to this tables, which is

Bad table and mysql 3.23.42

2001-09-18 Thread Peter Zaitsev
Hello mysql, Hello mysql, I'm quite lucky with providing with bad tables which does not repear properly or having other strange behavior. Here is one more: mysql 3.23.42 gnome:~ # mysqldump -d layers_st57 g01kw_engines # MySQL dump 8.16 # # Host: localhostDatabase: layers_st57 #--

Re[2]: GLIBC 2.2.4

2001-08-23 Thread Peter Zaitsev
Hello Trond, Thursday, August 23, 2001, 8:01:33 PM, you wrote: TEG> Peter Zaitsev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I'm trying to compile mysql 3.23.41 with recent glibc 2.2.4 but this >> somehow does not work with the following diagnose: TEG> It builds ju

Re[2]: GLIBC 2.2.4

2001-08-23 Thread Peter Zaitsev
Hello Sinisa, Thursday, August 23, 2001, 3:42:53 PM, you wrote: SM> Peter Zaitsev writes: >> Hello mysql, >> >> I'm trying to compile mysql 3.23.41 with recent glibc 2.2.4 but this >> somehow does not work with the following diagnose: >> >>

GLIBC 2.2.4

2001-08-23 Thread Peter Zaitsev
Hello mysql, I'm trying to compile mysql 3.23.41 with recent glibc 2.2.4 but this somehow does not work with the following diagnose: l/var\""-DSHAREDIR="\"/usr/local/mysql/share/mysql\"" -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I../bdb/build_unix -I../innobase/include

Query optimization issue.

2001-08-22 Thread Peter Zaitsev
Hello mysql, I was trying to load very huge (5GB 45mil rows) to the text dump in sorted order (according to primary key). The problem is mysql somehow does not wants to scan the table by primary key to produce sorted output row by row, but prefers to use filesort which would take quite

Re: HOWTO enable InnoDB

2001-08-10 Thread Peter Zaitsev
Hello ½ÉÃæº¸, Friday, August 10, 2001, 2:27:56 PM, you wrote: DISABLED means you're running with --skip-innodb AFAIK :) ½> Hi everyone. ½> I uninstalled mysql and reinstalled using --with-innodb configuration. ½> After install completed, I entered the command mysqladmin variables and ½> foun

Re: Timezone problem.

2001-08-07 Thread Peter Zaitsev
) Plain .40 with new INNODB with doublewrite -> This binary shiftes the time. Could you Heikke please check if you have something similar ? MW> Hi! >>>>>> "Peter" == Peter Zaitsev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Peter>> Hello mysql, Peter>> It s

Re[2]: Timezone problem.

2001-08-07 Thread Peter Zaitsev
the wrong time ? SM> Peter Zaitsev writes: >> Hello mysql, >> >> It seems like you made an incomportable changes in 3.23.40 without >> taking a time to write a release note :( >> >> The mysql 3.23.39 used the system timezone by default: >> >

Timezone problem.

2001-08-07 Thread Peter Zaitsev
Hello mysql, It seems like you made an incomportable changes in 3.23.40 without taking a time to write a release note :( The mysql 3.23.39 used the system timezone by default: maindb:/spylog/mysql/logs # date Tue Aug 7 13:31:56 MSD 2001 | transaction_isolation | READ-COMMITTE

Re[2]: I got it hanged !

2001-07-17 Thread Peter Zaitsev
Hello Jamie, Tuesday, July 17, 2001, 7:40:03 AM, you wrote: If I'm not mistaken this was other bug. At least I remember I've reported really same looking bug which make sometimes mysql hang after optimize or repair table (may be alter table also had it). JM> I've been experiencing a simmilar p

Re: InnoDB behaviour with multiple clients

2001-07-10 Thread Peter Zaitsev
Hello Denis, Tuesday, July 10, 2001, 12:51:40 PM, you wrote: If I'm not mistaken the problem is - conflicting transactions which you have here. I'm really not shure INNODB dead lock detection is quite fine graned. Also it's shurely may roll back more long running transaction. But anyway you

Re[3]: Trouble with mysql

2001-07-05 Thread Peter Zaitsev
Hello Michael, Wednesday, July 04, 2001, 1:49:25 AM, you wrote: MW> Next time the table gets corrupt, please upload a copy to 'secret' MW> before you repair it so that I can take a look at this when I come MW> back. OK. MW> Do you have anything in the logs about the table being automaticly re

mysql 3.23.38 bug

2001-07-05 Thread Peter Zaitsev
Hello mysql, It seems like if load data infile initiated to dammaged table sometimes after repair it does not unblock itself: maindb:/spylog/db/tmpd # mysqladmin processlist | grep -v Sleep ++--++---+-+---+--+

Re[2]: Trouble with mysql

2001-07-02 Thread Peter Zaitsev
Hello Michael, Thursday, June 28, 2001, 11:41:57 PM, you wrote: I'm getting this again and again with two tables which are used in quite the same fation - some selects, often updates, rare inserts, no deletes: mysql> repair table counter.quickstat; +---++--+-

Re: Trouble with mysql

2001-06-28 Thread Peter Zaitsev
Hello Michael, Thursday, June 28, 2001, 1:52:09 PM, you wrote: MW> Hi! >>>>>> "Peter" == Peter Zaitsev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Peter>> Hello monty, Peter>> after upgrading mysql 3.23.36 to mysql 3.23.29 I started to get a Peter>>

MYSQLDUMP feature request :)

2001-06-24 Thread Peter Zaitsev
Hello mysql, Resently MYSQL have introduced transaction support, which at least in INNODB allows to make consistent backup/recovery. The bad thing about this is - MYSQLDUMP does not support anything about this, so I had to done the same things buy hands. The Idea is quite simple - to

transactions and pconnect (PHP)

2001-06-15 Thread Peter Zaitsev
Hello mysql, I'm planing to use transactions in application written in PHP, which of course uses pconnect to optimize perfomance. Few time ago I had to stop using "lock tables" as this lead to locked system then somehow the php script was aborted before unlock tables. With transacti

Some more info about backup.

2001-06-02 Thread Peter Zaitsev
Hello mysql, I'm repeating my test's now with more information and on more powerfull maching with no load now, this should give more accurate results. The machine is Dual PIII-750/1GB RAM I'm trying the following table structure: CREATE TABLE g00hits ( id int(10) unsigned NOT NULL

BACKUP/RESTORE speed and delayed index creation.

2001-06-01 Thread Peter Zaitsev
Hello mysql, Today I played a little bit with two different ways of backup - first one is to use BACKUP TABLE (which works for myisam only) and the second one is SAVE DATA/LOAD DATA. In both cases if I'm not mistaken the file is wrote by mysqld server so there is no communication overh

Re: BDB tables bugs

2001-05-31 Thread Peter Zaitsev
Hello Michael, Thursday, May 31, 2001, 11:19:03 PM, you wrote: MW> Hi! >>>>>> "Peter" == Peter Zaitsev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Peter>> Hello bugs, Peter>> mysql 3.23.38 Peter>> Linux diamond 2.4.4.SuSE-12-4GB-SMP #8 SMP Sat May 19

BDB tables and mysql.

2001-05-28 Thread Peter Zaitsev
Hello mysql, I'm testing BDB tables in mysql to find out i'll be able to use them in my application. I was testing how does big tables work with BDB and so created table which is about 10GB in size. I could easy make it with multiple inserts from test-insert, so the problem with inse

Optimize Folks.

2001-05-17 Thread Peter Zaitsev
Hello mysql, Currently mysql waits until disk space freed for myisam tables for all situations exept of repair and optimize. Even more table is marked as crashed and will not repair automatically even after disk space freed. This situation is not really good thing i think, as if r

Re[2]: New user InnoDB comments

2001-05-16 Thread Peter Zaitsev
Hello Heikki, Wednesday, May 16, 2001, 4:01:26 PM, you wrote: HT> Andreas, HT> sorry, it is the default MySQL behavior to create a MyISAM table if HT> another handler is not present. HT> There was a long thread of emails between MySQL developers if MySQL HT> should give an error message if a t

MYISAM recovery.

2001-05-04 Thread Peter Zaitsev
Hello mysql, It seems like mysql sometimes tries to hard to repair the table with myisam tables with fixed row format. I've had a chance to several times found data in one of the tables completely destroyed - the data looked like random. mysql> select * from g01layers_stat_cities limit

Question.

2001-05-03 Thread Peter Zaitsev
Hello mysql, Any ideas how this may happen: Mysql version 3.23.37, auto recovery turned on. mysql> check table layers_st50.g00stat_sitepaths; +---+---+--++ | Table | Op| Msg_type | Msg_text

Re[2]: Some more about mysql perfomance.

2001-04-08 Thread Peter Zaitsev
Hello Michael, Sunday, April 08, 2001, 4:21:18 AM, you wrote: Peter>> No it's not but it has just a couple of collisions per 100.000 Peter>> records. MW> The problem with a not unique key is that MySQL will do an extra check MW> if it should use the key during the optimization stage. If the

Re: Some more about mysql perfomance.

2001-04-07 Thread Peter Zaitsev
Hello Michael, Saturday, April 07, 2001, 3:14:42 AM, you wrote: MW> Hi! >>>>>> "Peter" == Peter Zaitsev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Peter>> Hello mysql, Peter>> I made one more test of mysql perfomance. Peter>> PIII-700/768Mb/L

Re[2]: Some more about mysql perfomance.

2001-04-07 Thread Peter Zaitsev
Hello Tim, Saturday, April 07, 2001, 3:21:52 AM, you wrote: >> The reason singly queries are slower are of course that the >> initialization phase (reading the data from a socket, parsing, >> locking, checking which keys to use) is about half of the query time. >> >> Peter> Heikki made tests

Some more about mysql perfomance.

2001-04-06 Thread Peter Zaitsev
Hello mysql, I made one more test of mysql perfomance. PIII-700/768Mb/Linux 2.4.2 glbc 2.1.3 I had the followings table with 12.000.000 rows (well I checked this with 1 rows as well but the speed does not differs much) in it and I checked how fast I can select data by hash ke

Mysql speed :)

2001-04-05 Thread Peter Zaitsev
Hello mysql, I've resenty tried to becnhmark mysql in really simple case. I need to select indexes really fast so I did "select * from pages where hash=11" there was a key on hash and the query returned only one row. The query was constant and server ad no other load. I've run this on

Strange problem.

2001-04-05 Thread Peter Zaitsev
Hello , Few time ago I've started to get the following problems, which several times allready lead to data lost for me. Here is the example: I found the followings in my application error log: Query - #1017 [opal.local] - Can't find file: 'g04stat_languages.MYD' (errno: 2) select visitors,loa

mysql 3.23.36 problem

2001-03-29 Thread Peter Zaitsev
Hello mysql, Resently I've found a problem when I was trying to upgrade from 3.23.32 to 3.23.36, well I had a same problem then tried to upgrade to 3.23.33 so decided to wait a bit, but now i think I should check more about this. The problem is the followings: Sometimes then I rename a

Re[2]: Benchmarking innobase tables

2001-03-19 Thread Peter Zaitsev
Hello Heikki, Monday, March 19, 2001, 4:40:30 PM, you wrote: >>Also the problem with innobase_flush_log_at_trx_commit=0 should be >>there is no guarantie the last transaction commited will be on it's >>place if the power would be lost. Also I don't know is it possible in >>this case for databa

Re[2]: Innobase in MySQL

2001-03-18 Thread Peter Zaitsev
Hello Greg, Sunday, March 18, 2001, 9:29:45 PM, you wrote: >> The only problem I see here - i don't know how innobase/bdb will >> handle tables without primary key... i think perfomance should not be >> so good as with myisam. Still there is a possibility to load all data >> to myisam and then

Re[2]: Benchmarking innobase tables

2001-03-18 Thread Peter Zaitsev
Hello Christian, Sunday, March 18, 2001, 12:22:44 PM, you wrote: >> >>If you are going to be committing on every record, you'll want your >>tablespace and logfile directories on separate disks to avoid >>thrashing. If you only have one disk and don't care if you lose the >>last few transactions

Re[2]: Innobase in MySQL

2001-03-18 Thread Peter Zaitsev
Hello Andreas, Saturday, March 17, 2001, 6:36:17 PM, you wrote: AV> I noticed that in 3. and 4. the machine load was constantly at 100% during AV> the inserts. AV> but during index recreation the load springs wildley between 0 and 100%, so AV> the machine is not maxed out in terms of CPU utili

Re[2]: Innobase in MySQL

2001-03-18 Thread Peter Zaitsev
Hello Greg, Saturday, March 17, 2001, 3:31:53 AM, you wrote: GC> It would be very handy if Innobase (and the GEMINI when it comes along) GC> where to support mysqldump in the standard way, as I assume it works as GC> such and I and many others would have to change thier backup scripts. GC> Del

Re[3]: Innobase in MySQL

2001-03-16 Thread Peter Zaitsev
Hello Michael, Wednesday, March 14, 2001, 4:41:21 PM, you wrote: Peter>> Well I tried to do so but still it takes an amount of time to add the Peter>> indexes... Peter>> I think the good Idea would be to add to mysqldump an option to create Peter>> the table without index, then insert all data

Innobase table check.

2001-03-15 Thread Peter Zaitsev
Hello Heikki, Finally I was able to check the innobase tables included into mysql 3.23.34. Well first several times I was quite happy about them, but later understud that this is because option --create-options is broken :) So now I must say On my system innobase seems to work as bad

Re[2]: Innobase in MySQL

2001-03-14 Thread Peter Zaitsev
Hello Dan, Tuesday, March 13, 2001, 6:37:16 PM, you wrote: DN> In the last episode (Mar 13), Peter Zaitsev said: >> Well guys mysqldump have one serious problem - the speed. >> >> The backup speed is quite upsetting and loads system much, but the >> worst thing is re

Re[7]: More Innobase questions (Was: RE: Innobase)

2001-03-13 Thread Peter Zaitsev
Hello Heikki, Monday, March 12, 2001, 11:51:54 PM, you wrote: HT> Hi Peter, HT> and sorry that this response to your Big Mail comes some 12 days late. HT> We have put together the release 3.23.34a and that has occupied HT> my mind. No Problem. At least the progress is going :) I'll try to test

Re[2]: Innobase in MySQL

2001-03-13 Thread Peter Zaitsev
Hello Heikki, Tuesday, March 13, 2001, 1:31:04 AM, you wrote: HT> Joshua, >>I hope you can also use MySQL dump, in which case, you don't have to shut >>down, right? HT> yes, you can use mysqldump without shutting down. It did not come to my HT> mind that actually mysqldump is a kind of online

Re[2]: MYSQL Feature :)

2001-03-01 Thread Peter Zaitsev
Hello Sinisa, Thursday, March 01, 2001, 3:42:46 PM, you wrote: SM> > I'm not really shure if this is a bug or correct behavior, but still SM> > it leads to toe problems in this case: SM> > SM> > insert into g02layers_stat_hits set counter=1, type=1, page_group=1; SM> > ERROR 1062: Duplicat

MYSQL Feature :)

2001-02-28 Thread Peter Zaitsev
Hello mysql, Mysql 3.23.32 running on Linux. I've got a table with auto_increment command stuck, well this is no problem there is a record in this table with MAX_UINT value. I'm not really shure if this is a bug or correct behavior, but still it leads to toe problems in this case: insert int

Re: Select bug?

2001-02-28 Thread Peter Zaitsev
Hello Mike, Wednesday, February 28, 2001, 3:55:35 AM, you wrote: You should know what you can't do direct comparasions between float number and float const as the number really stored in a database can be slightly different i.e 355.619 M

Re[3]: More Innobase questions (Was: RE: Innobase)

2001-02-26 Thread Peter Zaitsev
Hello Heikki, Monday, February 26, 2001, 5:08:52 PM, you wrote: HT> Hi! HT> There were more questions about Innobase: >>Here is the comming question - can you speak some more about apace >>allocation consepts used in innobase. For example how would it like to >>work with huge number (10.000+ o

Re[2]: More Innobase questions (Was: RE: Innobase)

2001-02-24 Thread Peter Zaitsev
ation (i.e several tablespaces with external mirroring) it will be hard to recover. Other question - files sizes. Does innobase itself support 4GB+ files? >>Sander> -Original Message-> From: Peter Zaitsev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> Sent: 22 February 2001 19:52> To:

Innobase

2001-02-22 Thread Peter Zaitsev
Hello mysql, Today I got a chance to compile mysql 3.23.34 with innobase, so althought it's not out yet I'll give some of my comments The version I'm speaking about got from work.mysql.com 1) It does not even configure then trying to configure --with-innobase-db the problem is autocon

Re[2]: iNNOBASE

2001-02-19 Thread Peter Zaitsev
Hello Heikki, Monday, February 19, 2001, 5:24:10 PM, you wrote: HT> Peter, HT> I guess you mean the source tree at www.bitkeeper.com? The interface HT> file ha_innobase.cc can be found there, but not yet the Innobase HT> source, I think. Then it cannot yet be compiled from the source tree, HT>

iNNOBASE

2001-02-19 Thread Peter Zaitsev
Hello mysql, Good day. I'm now trying to build mysql 3.23.34 aviable in bitkeeper tree, to get a chance to check innobase table handler before release is out, to make chance for release to be more stable :) Currently I have the following problem - innobase is allready in tree but con

Merge table problem.

2001-02-16 Thread Peter Zaitsev
Hello monty, I'm trying to use merge table for logging - to have a possibility to Rotate log files and to quickly delete old data - for this I'm goint to setup a number of merge tables where each contains data for one day, and the inserts are done to the last table using real table name

Re: BDB

2001-02-09 Thread Peter Zaitsev
Hello Michael, Friday, February 09, 2001, 3:48:53 AM, you wrote: Peter>> as you see here one thread is doing repear as this happened after Peter>> mysqld crash, but note first insert query in system lock state (I've Peter>> saw several queries at this place, but all of them spent in system Pet

BDB

2001-02-08 Thread Peter Zaitsev
Hello mysql, 1) Today I tried to reload my tables with backuing up and recovering whole database by mysqldump - it seems like it does not work - mysqld crashed during loading data back even after I've removed all bad tables and bdb logs to have a clean system. This looks like the same

Re: Strange bug with BDB

2001-02-08 Thread Peter Zaitsev
Hello Michael, Thursday, February 08, 2001, 1:58:24 AM, you wrote: Peter>> I've done mysqladmin "flush logs" and then copied the .frm and .db Peter>> files into other database directory - and the bug was unable to be Peter>> repaired. MW> I assume you mean 'unable to be repeated' ? Yes of co

Re[2]: Strange bug with BDB

2001-02-06 Thread Peter Zaitsev
Hello Miguel, Wednesday, February 07, 2001, 5:52:50 AM, you wrote: MAS> I have made the following table on Win2000 machine: C:\mysql\bin>>mysql MAS> Welcome to the MySQL monitor. Commands end with ; or \g. MAS> Your MySQL connection id is 3 to server version: 3.23.30-gamma MAS> Type 'help;'

Strange bug with BDB

2001-02-06 Thread Peter Zaitsev
Hello mysql, mysql 3.23.32 + BDB 3.2.3h mysql> select * from layers_la00.g03last_hit; +++-+++ | updated| counter_id | stat_id | lasthit_ts | lasthit_id | +++-++

Re[4]: Serious MySQL internal deadlock

2001-02-06 Thread Peter Zaitsev
Hello Sinisa, Sunday, February 04, 2001, 3:15:21 PM, you wrote: SM> Peter Zaitsev writes: SM> > Hello Andreas, SM> > SM> > Thursday, February 01, 2001, 7:42:31 PM, you wrote: SM> > SM> > SM> > I must confirm the problem with table locks. Mysql r

Re[2]: Serious MySQL internal deadlock

2001-02-03 Thread Peter Zaitsev
Hello Andreas, Thursday, February 01, 2001, 7:42:31 PM, you wrote: I must confirm the problem with table locks. Mysql realy may deadlock sometimes, and the funny thing is the solution to this case is to kill the oldest locked thread waiting this condition - afterwards everything resolves. So th

Autorepair bug

2001-01-28 Thread Peter Zaitsev
Hello monty, It seems like something changed in 3.23.31 and 32 in auto_repair there. I see on many servers after crash (i've resently got unexpected powerdown for 10 of my machines so it worked like a good testcase) I got tables failed to be repaired (or well selects fail on them) 28.Jan 12:26:

Re: BDB & Check tables

2001-01-25 Thread Peter Zaitsev
Hello Michael, Friday, January 26, 2001, 12:20:43 AM, you wrote: MW> Hi! >>>>>> "Peter" == Peter Zaitsev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Peter>> Hello monty, Peter>> As I remember according to documentation MYSQL should support check Peter>

BDB & Check tables

2001-01-25 Thread Peter Zaitsev
Hello monty, As I remember according to documentation MYSQL should support check table on BDB tables: `CHECK TABLE' only works on `MyISAM' and `BDB' tables. On `MyISAM' tables it's the same thing as running `myisamchk -m table_name' on the

mysql 3.23.32 & table problems

2001-01-24 Thread Peter Zaitsev
Hello monty, I'm using mysql 3.23.32 on linux and it looks like there is a problem with check/auto-recovery left: On many of my servers I find the above in a log file: 24.Jan 23:45:07 : pid:1412 counter:32256 AllInOne MySqlEr Query - #1034 [tor.local] - Incorrect key file for table: 'g09

  1   2   >