Hi,
I noticed that over the months the dump of my databases (very
subject to modifications, but not subject to increase significantly in
size) gets progressively slower: from ~8 minutes to almost 15 in 6
months.
How can I avoid this degeneration?
Thanks,
Nico
--
MySQL General Mai
Il giorno mar, 28/04/2009 alle 17.11 -0400, Baron Schwartz ha scritto:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 1:04 PM, Rolando Edwards
> wrote:
> > Make sure the tables that the information_schema are not locked.
> >
> > This is because MyISAM tables, that are constantly being inserted into
> > (Each
Hi,
in Mysql 5.0 accessing information_schema.tables means almost
certainly dropping down the DBMS.
With my configuration
412 databases
357417 grants
every query to information_schema.tables takes minutes, while the
equivalent show tables from... (that I can't absolutely use)
is immediate.
Is
On Wednesday 15 April 2009 17:24:21 Baron Schwartz wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I just blogged about this:
> http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2009/04/15/how-to-decrease-inno
>db-shutdown-times/
>
> Short version:
>
> mysql> set global innodb_max_dirty_pages_pct = 0;
>
> and wait until Innodb_buffer_pool_pag
Hi,
after many years that I've been using mysql (with almost all Innodb
tables) I still can't make myself a reason of the unbearably long
shutdown times: almost everytime it takes at least 4 minutes to stop
completely and to kill the process; sometimes I even had to kill -9
mysqld.
Currently
Hi,
for 2 consecutive nights I got the following message in the log,
followed by a restart:
090323 2:00:14 - mysqld got signal 10;
This could be because you hit a bug. It is also possible that this
binary
or one of the libraries it was linked against is corrupt, improperly
built,
or misconfigu
Hi,
I guess that when I'm using only Innodb and no replication I can
safely disable mysql's (bin-) log files (that grow to no end) because
Innodb has its own log files. Is it correct?
Thanks,
Nico
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe
Il Wednesday 09 April 2008 19:40:32 Rob Wultsch ha scritto:
> On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 5:51 AM, Nico Sabbi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The problem I have is that importing the same 7 MB sql dump
> > takes 9 seconds if engine=Myisam and 98 when engine is Innodb.
> >
&g
Hi,
I installed Mysql 5.0.45 on Solaris 10 01/08 configured to run
the datadir on a ZFS filesystem on a Raid1 pool.
Both myisam and innodb tables are on the same filesystem.
Innodb is configured to run with a buffer_pool_size=256M,
with doublewrite set to OFF and with file_per_table to Off.
The log
On Wednesday 09 April 2008 13:03:39 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> To confirm that you would like
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> added to the mysql mailing list, please click on
> the following link:
>
>
> http://lists.mysql.com/s/mysql/47fca28b736fbf40/Nicola.Sabbi=poste.
>it
>
> This confirmation serv
On Wednesday 09 April 2008 13:02:57 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> To confirm that you would like
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> added to the mysql mailing list, please click on
> the following link:
>
> http://lists.mysql.com/s/mysql/47fca2617dc97f36/nsabbi=tiscali.it
>
> This confirmation serves two p
Hi,
I followed the instructions to change columns values from an encoding
another
(in my case from latin1 to utf8), but the operation simply failed.
The manual reads
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/alter-table.html :
"
If you want to change the table default character set and all ch
Hi,
in /etc/my.cnf I set innodb_file_per_table in order to avoid a
centralized set of ibdata* files,
but that file (8 MB) is still present and continually updated.
What can I do to make it vanish for good? I'd like to have only
per-table ibd files.
The version of Mysql that I'm using is mys
Hi,
I'm experiencing some sporadic "connection refused" from mysql-max server.
I'd like to keep track of these events, so is there a way to log on the
server
these 3 items?
- date and time
- ip of the client
- reason of the refusal
Thanks,
Nico
--
Email.it, the professional e-mail, gratis
Mads Martin Joergensen wrote:
Dear MySQL users,
We are proud to present to you the MySQL Server 5.1.14 Beta
release, a new Beta version of the popular open source database.
Bear in mind that this is a beta release, and as any other pre-production
release, caution should be taken when installin
Mike Kruckenberg wrote:
mysql> SET @staff_id = LAST_INSERT_ID();
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.01 sec)
I don't know if this behaviour has changed in later versions of mysql,
but using session variables, although lovely, was the quickest way to
break replication (at least up to and including 4.
Mário Gamito wrote:
Hi,
I have a 3.23 MySQL running in a server and i want to install 5.0.27
I made
# ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/mysql-5.0.27 --with-tcp-port=3307
# make
# make install
and then
# scripts/mysql_install_db --datadir=/usr/local/mysql-5.0.27/var
# ./mysqld_safe --datadir=/
Chris wrote:
An additional note - you can only do this while mysql is completely
shut down. You cannot do this while mysql is running on either server.
why is it that I received this mail 3 times? I can understand 2 (one to
my and one to the list), but 3 ...
--
Email.it, the profess
Ratheesh K J wrote:
Hlo all,
I wanted to move around 50 GB of data on Machine A to Machine B. Both the machines are of same architecture ( LAMP )
Dumping and restoring takes a lot of time. Is there a faster method to
accomplish the same?
Is there a way to tar the whole thing and untar on M
Nico, as a first stab, I would try optimizing the tables in question.
OPTIMIZE TABLE mysql.user
etc.
The one with 194,177 entries would be a good candidate for this especially.
done, but with no improvement
I wonder also if you would see something logged in the slow query log
as this happe
Hello,
as the title reads, when a user X with access to few tables runs "show
databases"
the query executes _very_ slowly and there's a sudden HUGE load (mysqld
takes 99% cpu for the whole
duration of the query):
show databases;
++
| Database |
+--
Hi,
after having noticed occasional load spikes I created an Innodb monitor;
follows an excerpt of the output where I can read that certain
transactions don't start
and that accessing a table (H.albero) with a very low amount of records
(185)
seems to take a lot of time.
What's wrong with thes
Hi,
I have a strange and annoying problem with Mysql 4.0.26 that I hope
someone will help me to fix:
the more databases a user has the less time it takes to execute "show
databases" and vice versa:
show databases;
+--+
5 rows in set (7.97 sec)
---
Hi,
I don't understand how GRANTS are replicated in Mysql 4.0.26 (I can't
upgrade to a newer version).
The servers were all cleanly installed from scratch (not upgraded) using
Mysql's 4.0.26 official rpm.
According to the manual GRANT statements should be replicated and after
executing
'flush
Hi,
my mysql always executes case insensitive queries:
SELECT username FROM workflow.user WHERE username = 'NicO' LIMIT 1;
+--+
| username |
+--+
| nico |
+--+
1 row in set (0.01 sec)
that field is of varchar(255) type.
I don't understand the reason for this beha
sorry for this monologue-thread, but...
Nico Sabbi wrote:
[snip]
If it can help, seems that the largest value I can store in a blob field
without triggering that error is 192 characters long.
I just read the restrictions on Innodb tables, and I'm not convinced
that what is going
Nico Sabbi wrote:
Hi,
with mysql 4.1[234], importing a dump of Innodb tables containing at
least a blob field
I invariably get_
ERROR 1030 (HY000) at line 21027: Got error 139 from storage engine
I read in the bugzilla that this problem is due to low memory
conditions, but
surely it'
0 11:46:31 InnoDB: Started; log sequence number 0 18025704
/usr/sbin/mysqld-max: ready for connections.
Version: '4.1.14-Max' socket: '/var/lib/mysql/mysql.sock' port: 3306
MySQL Community Edition - Max (GPL)
Is there a way to fix this behaviour or should I revert to 4.0?
Tha
Administrator
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, Nico Sabbi wrote:
hi,
my mysql is a 4.0.21. After a flush privileges I can see all granted
accesses.
Thanks for you help!
Nico
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
it seems my Grants are not entirely propagated from the master to the slave
(some are active, some are not).
The slave is configured to replicate all databases, and the replication
client
has all privileges on the master.
What is necessary to propagate every single grant?
Thanks,
--
Nico
ld like mysql to kill or forget the existence of
that user.
Besides, I'm not supposed to mess with a dbms' internal tables, nor to know
how/where grants are stored.
--
Nico Sabbi - Officine Digitali - Bologna
Tel. 051 - 4187565
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists
-++
| version | 4.0.21-Max-log |
+---++
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
what am I doing wrong?
Thanks,
--
Nico Sabbi - Officine Digitali - Bologna
Tel. 051 - 4187565
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
g_size=2500
set-variable = relay_log_space_limit=5000
max_relay_log_size seems to be respected, but the problem remains:
after having the data inserted in the DB those logs are useless.
Can't Mysql automatically purge logs when they are not needed anymore?
Thanks,
--
Nico Sabbi - Officine Digi
dead/unmaintained project?
Another problem: building the sources of Mysql*.src.rpm
never builds Mysql-shared-compat, that is often indispensable.
Can someone please update the specfile?
Thanks,
--
Nico Sabbi - Officine Digitali - Bologna
Tel. 051 - 4187565
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives:
igidiyor.com & http://www.dalar.net
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Nico Sabbi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, July 12, 2004 6:08 PM
> Subject: Replication stopping
>
>
Hi,
it happened again just now, this
Hi,
often my slave suddenly stops, reporting these the logs:
040712 12:19:00 Slave I/O thread exiting, read up to log 'db-bin.3323',
position 197564621
040712 12:19:10 Slave I/O thread: connected to master
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]:3306', replication started in log 'db-bin.3323' at
position 19756462
Hi,
I have this entry in my logfile:
040524 12:30:06 Got fatal error 1236: 'log event entry exceeded
max_allowed_packet; Increase max_allowed_packet on master' from master wh
en reading data from binary log
040524 12:30:06 Slave I/O thread exiting, read up to log 'db-bin.3320',
positio
Alle Wednesday 12 May 2004 21:51, hai scritto:
> Hi!
>
> On May 12, Nico Sabbi wrote:
> > Alle Wednesday 12 May 2004 14:12, hai scritto:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > On May 12, Nico Sabbi wrote:
> > > > Alle Wednesday 12 May
Alle Wednesday 12 May 2004 16:14, Egor Egorov ha scritto:
> Nico Sabbi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Alle Wednesday 12 May 2004 14:12, hai scritto:
> >> > > > sorry for replying to myself, but I verified that adding
> >> > > > repl
Alle Wednesday 12 May 2004 14:12, hai scritto:
> Hi!
>
> On May 12, Nico Sabbi wrote:
> > Alle Wednesday 12 May 2004 11:19, Sergei Golubchik ha scritto:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > > sorry for replying to myself, but I verified that adding
> > > >
Alle Wednesday 12 May 2004 11:19, Sergei Golubchik ha scritto:
> Hi!
>
> On May 11, Nico Sabbi wrote:
> > Alle Tuesday 11 May 2004 15:33, Nico Sabbi ha scritto:
> > > Alle Tuesday 11 May 2004 15:00, Egor Egorov ha scritto:
> > > > Nico Sabbi <[EMAIL PROTEC
Hi,
with this patch if you use mysqldump with -c the db name will precede the
table name.
Hopefully this will solve the replication problem I described earlier.
ico
--- mysqldump.c.orig 2004-02-10 19:15:59.0 +0100
+++ mysqldump.c 2004-05-11 17:33:16.407884792 +0200
Alle Tuesday 11 May 2004 15:33, Nico Sabbi ha scritto:
> Alle Tuesday 11 May 2004 15:00, Egor Egorov ha scritto:
> > Nico Sabbi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > as the title says mysqldump 4.0.18 (and previous versions) doesn't want
> > >
Alle Tuesday 11 May 2004 15:00, Egor Egorov ha scritto:
> Nico Sabbi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > as the title says mysqldump 4.0.18 (and previous versions) doesn't want
> > to dump data in the format
> >
> > insert into db.table values()
>
Hi,
as the title says mysqldump 4.0.18 (and previous versions) doesn't want
to dump data in the format
insert into db.table values()
not even using -e or -a.
Is there any other cli switch that can do this?
Another question: is there a way to dump all dbs that DON'T match a
pattern without res
Alle Friday 30 April 2004 16:44, hai scritto:
> At 16:22 +0200 4/30/04, Nico Sabbi wrote:
> >Alle Friday 30 April 2004 15:51, hai scritto:
> >> >P.S. the manual doesn't say that grants super, reload, replication
> >> > client and replication slave
Alle Friday 30 April 2004 15:51, hai scritto:
> >P.S. the manual doesn't say that grants super, reload, replication client
> > and replication slave can be used only on *.* and not on DB.*.
>
> Each of those privileges is listed as an administrative privilege here:
>
> http://dev.mysql.com/doc/mysq
Alle Friday 30 April 2004 15:22, Victoria Reznichenko ha scritto:
> Hmm..
> Your queries worked fine for me:
>
> ANT REPLICATION SLAVE, REPLICATION CLIENT, SUPER, RELOAD ON *.* TO
> 'replica'@'B' IDENTIFIED BY PASSWORD '715a443962d324cc'; Query OK, 0 rows
> affected (0.00 sec)
>
> mysql> show grant
Hi,
I'm running mysql-max 4.0.18 on two servers on separate networks, master is A
and slave is B.
The problem is that if I don't grant on the master the full range of
privileges to the slave the replication doesn't even start.
Even worse is the fact that grants seems to be totally managed at ra
Hi, I just installed mysql-max 3.23.51, hoping to use innodb autoextend feature, but
mysql dies when run with the following row in my.cnf:
innodb_data_file_path = ibdata1:512M:autoextend;ibdata2:256M:autoextend;
complaining of an unrecognized option.
Thanks,
Nico
HI,
I have two questions:
1) is there a way to tell my mysql master not to log failed executions, such as
creation of existing tables, drop of inexistant databases etc?
Each of these operations lock the slave, and I believe that it' conceptually wrong
logging them, since they never took pla
Hi, I'm using a db with few tables, one of which is reported below:
CREATE TABLE `keywords` (
`keyword` varchar(128) NOT NULL default '',
`codice` varchar(16) NOT NULL default '',
`timestamp` int(11) NOT NULL default '0',
`soundekw` varchar(32) NOT NULL default '',
PRIMARY KEY (`key
Hi,
I'm still using Mysql 3.23.46 because, as far as I remember, in .47 was reintroduced
the limit of 500 chars max in Innodb primary keys (limit that would break my
application). Is it still present ?
Is it present in Mysql 4 ?
I also need to know if Innodb is reliable in replication mode
53 matches
Mail list logo