I am having similar issues. I moved a copy of mysqld_safe to init.d and
removed the old startup script, this had the effect of lowering the number
of processes from about 30 something to 7 or 8. However mysqld_safe now
appears as a subprocess of rc and under mysqld_safe is mysqld and under
t
Well stupid questions are usually responded to with simple answers like
rtfm. You'd think you'd be able to at least be able to install a version of
the daemon that's still supported before you get into advanced topics like
mysql -h
""Beauford"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAI
guous but is the only way to declare an
> outer JOIN with MySQL. When you use the explicit JOIN syntax, you are also
> less likely to form unintentional Cartesian products which can absolutely
> clobber a query's performance.
>
> Shawn Green
> Database Administrator
> Uni
l be used?
>
> There's no ON clause for a join specified by a WHERE clause, and that's
> one reason specifiying joins with JOIN ... ON .. is almost always
> preferable--it entirely disambiguates the join for the writer, readers,
> and those others who later will have to divin
68 665 - Mobile
+61 8 8408 4259 - Fax
-----Original Message-
From: Matt Monaco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 29 November 2005 1:40 PM
To: mysql@lists.mysql.com
Subject: Why are posts to this list showing up in my inbox?
I am using outlook express to view this mailing list, I do not
I am using outlook express to view this mailing list, I do not need the
posts actually mailed to my account, how can I address this?
Thanks in advance,
Matt
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTE
When using JOINS by the simply supplying a comma separated list of tables in
the FROM clause, is the ON argument normally associated with a join intended
to be addressed in the WHERE clause, or should ON still be used?
// Comma separated join
SELECT u.*, a.city FROM users u, addresses a WHERE u.id
