Annoying feature

1999-07-01 Thread tmg
When I 'G'et mail using POP3 internal to mutt, it writes directly to my mailbox. Is there a way to pass it to my SMTP service (I'm using qmail) instead and have it deliver the mail? This way I can filter it into appropriate folders as it comes in.

Re: Annoying feature

1999-07-01 Thread tmg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Why not use fetchmail instead? I'm using qmail+fetchmail+procmail+mutt > over here. Me too. Just thought it might be convenient sometimes to not have to leave mutt.

Re: Annoying feature

1999-07-02 Thread tmg
David DeSimone wrote: > So don't leave Mutt. > > macro index G "fetchmail" Sweet.

Re: Annoying feature

1999-07-02 Thread tmg
Thomas Roessler wrote: >> Me too. Just thought it might be convenient sometimes to not have >> to leave mutt. > > So just run fetchmail in daemon mode. Not very convenient on a dialup connection. Usually when I want my mail I want it NOW! (yes, I know about demand dialing) I think the macro sui

Re: Annoying feature

1999-07-02 Thread tmg
Randall J. Million wrote: > Write a macro that will call fetchmail. Should work, but I don't use > fetchmail. I'll look into that.

Re: Annoying feature

1999-07-02 Thread tmg
David DeSimone wrote: > You can start fetchmail from your /etc/ppp/ip-up script, and kill it in > your /etc/ppp/ip-down script. The next best thing to being there. Don't like that either. Although I send my mail that way.. The macro index G "fetchmail" is more what I was looking for.

Re: Email client poll

1999-07-15 Thread tmg
* Jeremy Blosser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've got some stuff like this on the web page -- it seems to me that people > need to first hear about Mutt and be curious enough to look into it, and > when that happens they will go to the web page. Why is it so important that Mutt be #1 on a Slash

Re: Email client poll

1999-07-16 Thread tmg
* Jeremy Blosser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It isn't at all. Mostly we were talking about people using other mailers > (like Pine) not because they liked the features the most but out of > inertia. As I said, *if we care*, there are things we could try to do > about this. If we don't care, we

Re: Email client poll

1999-07-16 Thread tmg
* David Thorburn-Gundlach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > % Why is it so important that Mutt be #1 on a Slashdot poll? > % Just curious. > > BECAUSE MUTT RULZ, d00d!!! Then it should promote itself, G.

Re: Email client poll

1999-07-16 Thread tmg
* Tom Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So we can win 'mindshare', and mutt will continue to work as the 'net > evolves. See http://www.cryptonomicon.com/beginning.html. I think we're not giving people enough credit. Just because they use some other mailer we think it's because they're forced to

Re: Email client poll

1999-07-17 Thread tmg
* Tom Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If there aren't enough mutt users, mutt will not be kept up to date, > and as new mail protocols etc. are created, mutt will eventually stop > working. As long as there are people using it it will keep working. It's doing just fine now right? I think tryin

Re: next-message command

1999-07-19 Thread tmg
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > just wondering if there is a next-message command or something in the > index, I want to be able to just go to the next message in some instances, > but if a message has been read once, and is marked for deletion,. then using > the commands

Re: Email client poll

1999-07-20 Thread tmg
* Anders Andersson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Heh, I love it the way people looks up to Mr Torvalds, "If Linus uses it, it > must be good". Like if all things Linus does is great, yeah right... The point was, if anyone isn't a stupid newbie, it's Linus.

Re: the ALT key

1999-07-22 Thread tmg
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How can I bind the ALT key, I would wuite like to use keys the same as Emacs > for paging up and down, C-v and M-v, but I can't find out how to bind the > ALT (META) key, the closest I have come is the escape key, but it doesn't > quite have the sam

Passing parameters to gpg

1999-08-24 Thread tmg
Is there any way to pass extra parameters to gpg?