Re: Mutt & 256 colors re-re-re-visited

2007-01-28 Thread cga2000
On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 01:05:11AM EST, Mun Johl wrote: > Hi, > > First of all, my apologies for bringing up this topic again. > > I am trying to get Mutt working with 256 colors on my Solaris 8 system. > I've tried both rxvt and mrxvt terminal emulators. I'm currently > compiling with ncurses (

Re: Mutt & 256 colors re-re-re-visited

2007-01-28 Thread cga2000
On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 06:50:31PM EST, Mun Johl wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for the reply. > Please see my comments below. > > On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 03:29 PM PST, cga2000 wrote: > > ... Text Deleted ... > > c> > I read through some old email threads re

Re: Mutt & 256 colors re-re-re-visited

2007-01-29 Thread cga2000
On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 10:44:32AM EST, Kyle Wheeler wrote: > On Sunday, January 28 at 10:15 PM, quoth Mun Johl: > >c> > Unfortunately, no. When I run mutt I do first set TERM=rxvt > >prior to > >c> > launching mutt. I have verified via executing a shell command from mutt > >c> > that the TERM i

Re: Mutt & 256 colors re-re-re-visited

2007-01-29 Thread cga2000
On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 07:42:52PM EST, Kyle Wheeler wrote: > On Monday, January 29 at 07:18 PM, quoth cga2000: > >> As you can see, when parsing something like "color34", *col becomes > >> 34, and is checked against the value of COLORS. COLORS is a value &g

Re: Mutt & 256 colors re-re-re-visited

2007-01-30 Thread cga2000
On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 01:42:36AM EST, Mun Johl wrote: > Hi Kyle, et al., > > Thanks for the constructive feedback. With your help, I first started > looking into my ncurses implementation. I cleaned things up best I > could and then downloaded and installed ncurses v5.6 compiled with 256 > col

Re: Mutt & 256 colors re-re-re-visited

2007-03-17 Thread cga2000
On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 01:05:11AM EST, Mun Johl wrote: > Hi, > > First of all, my apologies for bringing up this topic again. > > I am trying to get Mutt working with 256 colors on my Solaris 8 system. > I've tried both rxvt and mrxvt terminal emulators. I'm currently > compiling with ncurses (

Re: Colors and... nano or native pager??

2007-09-16 Thread cga2000
On Sun, Sep 16, 2007 at 03:21:29PM EDT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Sun, Sep 16, 2007 at 11:25:05AM -0400, John wrote: > > > > Here's one way of doing it, mostly lifted from the efforts of > > others. You can fiddle with colors to suit yourself, of course. > > Thank you so very much, John. Actu

Re: Colors and... nano or native pager??

2007-09-16 Thread cga2000
On Sun, Sep 16, 2007 at 07:19:11PM EDT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 12:59:26AM +0200, Eyolf ?strem wrote: > > > > Is this perhaps the place to suggest a switch to vim...? Not only is > > it the best editor in existence, it also has any color scheme > > imaginable (and then s

Re: Colors and... nano or native pager??

2007-09-24 Thread cga2000
On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 11:18:49AM EDT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 10:23:48AM -0400, Chris Bannister wrote: > > > Just put: > > set editor=/usr/bin/vim > > in your .muttrc > > > > Personalise your colours for vim in your .vimrc > > (Obviously, this is the wrong mailing lis

Re: How to send a return receipt

2007-10-16 Thread cga2000
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 11:18:05AM EDT, Jing Xue wrote: > > Quoting Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > >The concept of mail receipts is poorly designed; there is no way to > >implement > >a reliable receipt notification system with SMTP mail. *Many* of the > >better > >mail packages ther

Re: How to send a return receipt

2007-10-16 Thread cga2000
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 06:32:00PM EDT, Derek Martin wrote: [..] > Maintaining patches for features that lots of people want is a stupid > waste of work. If the maintainers don't want to maintain the code, > then they probably should stop being maintainers. Please be more specific. What are th

Re: How to send a return receipt

2007-10-17 Thread cga2000
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 07:33:46AM EDT, Derek Martin wrote: > On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 10:04:34PM -0400, cga2000 wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 06:32:00PM EDT, Derek Martin wrote: > > > Maintaining patches for features that lots of people want is a stupid > >

Re: Mutt Quick Reference v.1.00

2007-10-23 Thread cga2000
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 11:13:11AM EDT, Joseph wrote: > Since I couldn't find one I created Mutt Quick Reference v1.0 (PDF file) > especially useful for new users. > It is just two pages reference and looks best when you print it on a > Color Printer. > > I wanted to add a link to MuttWiki but I