Is there a way to make the arrow (with 'set arrow_cursor' in muttrc)
not be inverse-highlighted?
I looked in the faq but didn't see anything.
Thanks,
Brian
--
The 21st century begins on January 1, 2001.
Thanks, 'mono indicator normal' worked for me.
Brian
On Tue, Dec 21, 1999 at 10:40:16AM -0800, Michael Elkins wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 21, 1999 at 12:17:36PM -0600, brd wrote:
> > Is there a way to make the arrow (with 'set arrow_cursor' in muttrc)
> > not be in
Hi all. I have the following mailboxes set up in my muttrc:
mailboxes "!" =a2 =ph =zspam =mutt-users =zblocked =mac
When I get new mail in any of the folders (from procmail) except my
inbox, the %b field in my status bar gets updated. Likewise, when I do
'c' to change boxes, the new ones prese
Nevermind, I answered my own question as soon as I wrote this, of
course. My irc client turned out to be the culprit. It was displaying
a message on new mail to the inbox. I was so sure my shell was doing it
that I didn't think about other apps.
Brian
On Tue, Jan 04, 2000 at 02:55:35PM -0600,
Can someone point me to the url for the rpms of mutt compiled with
compressed folder support, please?
Thanks,
Brian
--
The 21st century begins on January 1, 2001.
I've noticed that when tryting to tag a whole thread with the -t
combo, sometimes it will work and sometimes not. I may have to do it a
few times before it works, but it's not the same number each time. I
think I've noticed the same thing with body search -b, so maybe
it's a bigger problem with
On Fri, Jun 30, 2000 at 02:42:25PM -0500, David Champion wrote:
> On 2000.06.30, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> "brd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I've noticed that when tryting to tag a whole thread with the -t
> > combo, sometimes it will w
On Sat, Nov 20, 1999 at 12:05:04PM -0500, Fairlight wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 20, 1999 at 10:53:52AM -0600, brd thus spoke:
> > Hi all. I've just switched to mutt a few days ago, after using elm
> > for the past 6 or 7 years. So far, it's easy to pick up, and I'm
>
Hi all. I've just switched to mutt a few days ago, after using elm
for the past 6 or 7 years. So far, it's easy to pick up, and I'm
liking it. One question I do have, though, is what should the lists
command actually do?
In my muttrc I have the line:
lists mutt (I also tried mutt-users)
but
I've come to love sort=threads. I leave sort_aux at date-sent.
I've noticed that even though they have the same subject, though, a reply
that comes with a date-sent that shows a time before the original message
(from someone who's time is off on their pc) does not get included as
part of the thre
Even after upgrading to 1.0, here's my listing:
8 t Nov 19 brad( 7) Re: today
9 r > Nov 19 To sean ( 11) today
10 T Nov 19 javierc ( 16) |->
11 > Nov 21 To sean ( 35) |->
I have sorting set to threads. I received 8 after I sent 9. My message
9 w
I believe mutt puts the asterisk when it is attempting to sort by
threads and finds matching subjects, but not in-reply-to fields, so
the asterisk is saying that it is "guessing" that this message goes
with this thread.
Brian
On Tue, Dec 14, 1999 at 05:22:30AM -0500, Subba Rao wrote:
>
> This h
12 matches
Mail list logo
