Re: SIMPLER SOLUTION for WWW/CGI interface to mutt

2001-04-11 Thread Raghavendra Bhat
M. Fioretti posts: > It would be more than enough, and far less bandwidth > consuming, something like this: > 1) WWW interface is just as any other webmail interface, >html/javascript/php/frames/CGI forms/etc.. Maybe a package called 'mailreader' is already out there. It is simple and work

Re: smtp server config?

2001-04-16 Thread Raghavendra Bhat
Apr 16, 2001 at 10:00:42PM, CB posts: > The only sticking point is djb's licensing. He purposely > makes it obtuse and purposely does not license it to the > norms djb's licensing not only sticks but sucks !! Throw out qmail and move over to Exim. It is you choice in the final lap...so run.

Re: Mutt and sendmail

2001-06-08 Thread Raghavendra Bhat
[Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 10:23:35AM +0530] Manoj Naik : > I suggest you use a MSA like masqmail/nullmailer > instead of a full fledged MTA on that box. Lookup a package called 'ssmtp'. Small and well done. Been using the same on an old 386 for a long time. -- ragOO, V