How do I set it up so that if I press save (s) on a mail in one of my
folders, say Mutt-users, the e-mail is appended to the file
+Saved/Mutt-users ?
Now sometimes mutt wants to save the e-mail to a file with the username
of the person who sent it.
Pardon my ignorance.
--
Preben Randhol
On Fri, Feb 25, 2000 at 03:05:09PM +0200, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
> Preben Randhol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Fri, 25 Feb 2000:
> > How do I set it up so that if I press save (s) on a mail in one of my
> > folders, say Mutt-users, the e-mail is appended to the file
2 Hans Ginzel ( 41) |->
As seen in line 123 here. How do I change this behaviour so that I get
my real name instead?
--
Preben Randhol -- [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] -- [http://www.pvv.org/~randhol/]
"Det eneste trygge stedet i verden er inne i
Anh Lai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 03/01/2002 (18:27) :
> how do i keep adding my signature when replying? I would like to add it only
> when composing a new messgae. Having my signature collect on the bottom gets
> annoying sometimes.
First read:
http://www.math.fu-berlin.de/~guckes/elm/
Dave Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 21/01/2002 (14:25) :
> Learn to use your screenreader better, and teach it to ignore or skip
> over quote chars at the start of a new line.
There is no point in sending a load of quoted stuff to anybody. Cut it
down to relevant part before you send. This is
Nick Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 21/01/2002 (14:47) :
> people did that they don't that would make my life easier. However, if
> we spend all our time worrying about every minority
> problem/consideration we'll never get *anything* done :)
Is it not a minority problem.
Preben
--
() J
Nick Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 21/01/2002 (17:20) :
[snipped away several quotes that should have been cut down in the
previous post]
> And there's where we differ, my point was just that the line above where
> preben decided to quote me was rather important. Is that where the
> hostil
Nick Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 21/01/2002 (16:50) :
> I think the quote is taken a little out of context.
> Bandwidth's a bugger on mailing lists huh?
If you get about 1000 overquoted mails a day, it is.
Preben
--
() Join the worldwide campaign to protect fundamental human rights.
"Derek D. Martin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 21/01/2002 (18:05) :
> See above where Preben said this is not a minority problem. He was
> refering to the fact that it is a much BROADER problem than just one
> that affects minorities. Your comment is irrelevant to that argument.
> (Preben: pleas
Brian Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 22/01/2002 (00:01) :
> It seems they're all LookOut users as well. Where the heck people get
> that crap is beyond me.
I thought the program was called LockOut ;-)
Another annoying thing is the 10 line disclaimer from companies that
this is a private e-m
Cameron Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 21/01/2002 (22:12) :
> You can't. It's rude anyway. The amount of time you spend trimming stuff
> to just the relevant stuff is _more_ than outweghed by the time saved
> to the list members as a whole, not to mention the readability of the
> mail archiv
René Clerc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 22/01/2002 (12:26) :
>
> Apart from the useful links, you're missing the point. Cameron was
> saying that the amount of time spent trimming is _outweighed_ by the
> time saved. That means that he means that one _should_ trim!
This is not correct at all. It
"Thomas E. Dickey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 23/01/2002 (20:31) :
> tsk, tsk (you should go back and read the paragraph to which you
> responded)
Yes I have done it 3 times and I don't understand your point. If you
could please be more clear when you post comments it would be nice.
There were
Rob 'Feztaa' Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 23/01/2002 (22:02) :
> The person was asking for a browser that could handle javascript. The
> one you said was 'better' doesn't support Javascript, either.
No he didn't ask for that. He said he used lynx. I said w3m is better,
but it isn't when you
I have just installed gnupg on my system and set it up. I wonder how
ever why people sign their mails to mailinglists? Perhaps there is
something wrong in my setup because I keep getting:
[-- PGP output follows (current time: tor 24-01-2002 11:56:40 CET) --]
gpg: Signature made ons 20-01-20
David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 24/01/2002 (12:18) :
>
> This has come up at least twice, in great detail, in recent memory.
> Check the archives for more so that we don't have to get into it again :-)
Ah I found it in the archive. Sorry should have searched better. And I
also found a way
David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 24/01/2002 (12:38) :
> % also found a way to get rid of this problem with signed posts (which I
> % think is unnecessary for ordinary posts).
>
> Without rising to the bait of your latter statement, what did you find as
> mentioned in your former statement?
David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 24/01/2002 (12:54) :
> Well, once you do, I'm interested in what you find. I understand the
> reasoning of the "don't sign mailing list posts" side and would like to
> see things that make their lives easier.
> If you don't want to be bothered, then please
"Drekka mer D. Martin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 24/01/2002 (19:34) :
> Sorry I misspelled your name. :) The point is, it's very, very easy
> to forge mail to mailing lists (or not to mailing lists, for that
> matter). It's much harder to forge a valid, signed mail, because you
> need access
"Derek D. Martin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 25/01/2002 (09:25) :
>
> Sure, but if you actually cared, you could get my key and try to
> verify it. Presumably, if you cared, you'd already have it, since my
> key ID is in my sig, and since you can configure gpg/mutt to get keys
> from a keyserv
Preben Randhol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 04/09/2002 (11:38) :
> Is there a way so I can set up a default hook which will be used for
> all folders that do not have a special folder-hook? If not I have to
> set up folder hooks for all the folders which is a bit cumbersome.
P
21 matches
Mail list logo
