Re: OT: imap filtering suggestions

2001-04-23 Thread Nate Johnston
Hanif Ladha spake thus: (Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 06:38:42AM -0700) > Solstice (tm) Internet Mail Server (tm) 2.0p11 IMAP4 > > Any idea if I can use procmail/or other filetring utilities with his > imap server? Sun Solstice Internet Mail Server is a re-branded version of Innosoft's PMDF MTA. It

popping mail into an imap mailbox

2001-07-18 Thread Nate Johnston
p.business.earthlink.net" set pop_user="[EMAIL PROTECTED]" set spoolfile="=work.ssn" TIA --N. -- Nate Johnston [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG footprint: DEAF B505 0D84 1AEF A43F 91C5 71B3 D053 D0E1 3C05 Unix System Administrator SingleSignon.net

Undefined PLT symbol "mbrtowc"

2001-07-23 Thread Nate Johnston
All, I have installed mutt on an older Pentium 100. When I try to execute it, I get the error: i mutt: Undefined PLT symbol "mbrtowc" (reloc type = 7, symnum = 166) I have attached my dmesg and the output of mutt -v. Does anyone know what this is and how I can fix it? --N. -- Nat

"default" color no longer valid

2001-08-09 Thread Nate Johnston
"/usr/pkg/etc" EXECSHELL="/bin/ksh" -MIXMASTER To contact the developers, please mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. To report a bug, please use the flea(1) utility. -- Nate Johnston [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG footprint: DEAF B505 0D84 1AEF A43F 91C5 71B3 D053 D0E1 3C05 "Nihil tam munitum quod non expugnari pecuna possit." -Cicero PGP signature

Re: SMTP AUTH-capable MTA

2001-08-13 Thread Nate Johnston
Suresh Ramasubramanian spake thus: (Sat, Aug 11, 2001 at 07:51:11AM +0530) > Nate Johnston [mutt-users] <10/08/01 14:51 -0500>: > > I am running mutt, but I do not want to submit my mail to the running > > Sendmail daemon for reliability reasons. I am looking for a util

folder-hook push tag-pattern ...

2001-08-17 Thread Nate Johnston
about this incorrectly? Is this something that, because it is tag-save instead of delete, I can only use a macro for? If I use a macro, can I break this into 2 parts as so: folder-hook INBOX 'push *d" macro *d '~d>2w=archive' Thanks! --N. -- Nate Johnston

Re: filtering out bcc with procmail

2001-09-21 Thread Nate Johnston
Paul Tremblay spake thus: (Fri, Sep 21, 2001 at 04:04:53PM -0400) > On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 09:09:43PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Right, you don't have access to the bcc. But procmail still should be > able to read the ^To line. It seems very simple. If the ^To line (I > mean, the actual

Help with `par`

2001-09-21 Thread Nate Johnston
and sig to be mangled. I call par as 'par 72gqr' in a shell script, and my PARINIT is "rTbgqR B=.,?_A_a Q=_s>|", which is the reccomended default. Does anyone have any par configs they would reccomend? --N. -- Nate Johnston [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG fo