Replying without "modifying"

2002-06-11 Thread Johan Svedberg
If there isn't, this might be something to implement? Thanks. /winkle -- |Mail address |Home telephonenumber|E-mail address | |Johan Svedberg |+46 (0)90 49 139|[EMAIL PROTECTED]| |Hästhagsvägen 2|| |

"Two word" alias

2002-06-11 Thread Johan Svedberg
Hi! I was just wondering if it's possible to have "two word" aliases? Like alias foo bar John Doe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>? Using "" doesn't seem to do it either, any ideas? /winkle -- |Mail address |Home telephonenumber |E-mail address

Auto sync-mailbox

2002-07-08 Thread Johan Svedberg
Hi! I was just wondering if mutt have some options for autorunning sync-mailbox ($)? -- |Mail address |Home telephonenumber|E-mail address | |Johan Svedberg |+46 (0)90 49 139|[EMAIL PROTECTED]| |Hästhagsvägen 2

askcc default

2002-08-22 Thread Johan Svedberg
Hi, all. Hmmm, according to 'man muttrc' the default for the askcc configuration variable is "no". this doesn't seem to be correct? Johan Svedberg -- |Mail address |Home telephonenumber|E-mail address | |Johan Svedberg |+46 (0)90 - 49 1

File browser statusbar

2002-08-27 Thread Johan Svedberg
Hi. Where do I change the stuff displayed in the file browsers statusbar? Johan Svedberg

PipeRead help

2002-09-07 Thread Johan Svedberg
Hi, all. I need some help. What I want to do is check if a program is on my system, and if it is I want to run it in my InitFunction. I'm guessing this could be done in a Function using PipeRead, but I have no idea how to do it... :-) Help would be greatly appriciated. Regards, Johan Sve

Re: PipeRead help

2002-09-07 Thread Johan Svedberg
On Sat, Sep 07, 2002 at 11:23:09PM +0200, Johan Svedberg wrote: > Hi, all. > > I need some help. What I want to do is check if a program is on my > system, and if it is I want to run it in my InitFunction. I'm guessing > this could be done in a Function using PipeRead, bu

Re: Outgoing messages folder

2002-09-17 Thread Johan Svedberg
ings is in section: > 6.3.83. index_format Ah, many thanks, both to you and Sven. :-) Regards, Johan Svedberg

Re: SOLVED vim startup

2002-09-18 Thread Johan Svedberg
On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 06:27:43PM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote: > * Dave Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-18 16:06]: > > By explicitely adding "set editor="/usr/bin/vi"", > > I get the correct results! > > and whow is this different from "set editor=vi"? > now, that's a surprise. > > set editor

Multiple coloring

2002-09-19 Thread Johan Svedberg
for deletion to be colored the same way, so my question is this: Is it possible to set some kind of priority for which color mutt should use in case a mail has both of these "conditions"? Regards, Johan Svedberg -- |Mail address |Home telephonenumber |E-mail address

$mail_check and $timeout

2002-09-20 Thread Johan Svedberg
Hi, all. Could some friendly soul describe the differens between these two settings ($mail_check and $timeout)? I've read the manual but I still don't quite understand. Does one overwrite the other one? Is there a reason why I wouldn't want these to be set equalent? Regards, Johan Svedberg

$mail_check and $timeout

2002-09-20 Thread Johan Svedberg
Hi, all. Could some friendly soul describe the differens between these two settings ($mail_check and $timeout)? I've read the manual but I still don't quite understand. Does one overwrite the other one? Is there a reason why I wouldn't want these to be set equalent? Regards, Johan Svedberg

In-Reply-To colors

2002-09-22 Thread Johan Svedberg
mple if a mailinglist has several people from *acc.umu.se alot of "wrong" mails get colored. So basically what I'm wondering is that if there is some way to get mutt to do "the right thing"? Regards, Johan Svedberg -- Johan Svedberg, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.acc.umu.se/~winkle

Re: In-Reply-To colors

2002-09-22 Thread Johan Svedberg
On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 02:17:55PM +0200, Stefan Frank wrote: > At Sun, Sep 22 2002 [13:35 +0200], Johan Svedberg aroused my curiosity with: > > Hi, everybody. > > Hallo :-) > > > I'm sitting here trying to get mutt to color all reply's to mails I've

Re: An idea (was: In-Reply-To colors)

2002-09-22 Thread Johan Svedberg
On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 02:31:30PM +0200, Johan Svedberg wrote: > On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 02:17:55PM +0200, Stefan Frank wrote: > > At Sun, Sep 22 2002 [13:35 +0200], Johan Svedberg aroused my curiosity with: > > > Hi, everybody. > > > > Hallo :-) > > >

Re: In-Reply-To colors

2002-09-22 Thread Johan Svedberg
messages that has the 'r' flag. Regards, Johan Svedberg

Re: An idea (was: In-Reply-To colors)

2002-09-22 Thread Johan Svedberg
On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 05:26:21PM +0200, Johan Svedberg wrote: > Hmmm, what about generating your own Message-ID header? Like > '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' then I could set a more accurate EXPR. But will that > screw other things up? Hmmm, that would brake against some ISO standard? :)

$check-new

2002-09-25 Thread Johan Svedberg
e mailbox the "N" flag marking new mails, although there really are new mails in that box because I can see the filesize of the mailbox change and when I enter it there are new mails in it. Has anyone else seen this? -- Johan Svedberg, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.acc.umu.se/~winkle

Re: $check-new

2002-09-25 Thread Johan Svedberg
On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 03:30:31PM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote: > * Johan Svedberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-25 13:15]: > > I'm using 'mutt -y' alot to monitor my mailboxes, and I have > > this to be able to see where I have new mail: bind browser $ > >

Re: $check-new

2002-09-26 Thread Johan Svedberg
On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 03:40:07AM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote: > don't forget about comp.mail.mutt! > http://www.google.com/search?q=mutt+%22new+mail%22&scoring=d Ah, TSM must be the problem, thanks. Johan

Re: $check-new -> TSM problem?

2002-09-26 Thread Johan Svedberg
On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 02:28:53PM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote: > * Johan Svedberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-26 09:58]: > > Sven Guckes wrote: > > > don't forget about comp.mail.mutt! > > > http://www.google.com/search?q=mutt+%22new+mail%22&scoring=d &

The browser

2002-09-26 Thread Johan Svedberg
Anyone experinced mutt going to the wrong mailbox when you're in the browsers mailbox view and place the indicator on some mailbox and press enter? -- Johan Svedberg, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.acc.umu.se/~winkle

Re: The browser

2002-10-01 Thread Johan Svedberg
On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 11:58:13AM -0700, John Iverson wrote: > * On Thu, 26 Sep 2002, Johan Svedberg wrote: > > > Anyone experinced mutt going to the wrong mailbox when you're > > in the browsers mailbox view and place the indicator on some > > mailbox and press

Re: The browser

2002-10-01 Thread Johan Svedberg
On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 01:16:41AM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote: > * Johan Svedberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-26 16:44]: > > Anyone experinced mutt going to the wrong mailbox > > when you're in the browsers mailbox view and place > > the indicator on some mailbox an

Re: The browser

2002-10-01 Thread Johan Svedberg
On Sat, Sep 28, 2002 at 09:51:11PM +0100, Dean Richard Benson wrote: > On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 06:26:25PM +0200, Johan Svedberg wrote: > > Anyone experinced mutt going to the wrong mailbox when you're in the > > browsers mailbox view and place the indicator on some mailbox