verse! Any ideas of what is going on here?
--
Holger Lillqvist
On May 12, Jonathan Pennington wrote:
> Again with the lost configs. I used to just type that sequence after
> writing an email and emacs would save and exit, automagically
> releasing control to Mutt. Unfortunately, now I have to explicitily
> exit before continuing. Does anyone know what I want
On Jul 9, David Champion wrote:
> On 2000.07.09, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> "Jason Helfman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I searched threw the manual and it looks us though you may not be able
> > to tag something as unread. If this is the case, why? If I am wrong, can
> > you please point
On Jul 25, David Ellement wrote:
> However, mutt doesn't keep track of the tag order, and for
> mbox folders at least, the reply goes to the first message in the
> folder.
Actually, the reply goes to the senders of _all_ the tagged messages.
With edit-headers this is no big problem, though.
The
e messages to all the messages which are
> tagged for deletion.
I guess he just wants to use _capital_ J and K to move to messages
marked for deletion.
--
Holger Lillqvist
ut this clobbers
> the suggested folder name - which is frequently useful.
One easy way to do get rid of the need for the prefixes '=' or '+' is
to use a shell alias which starts mutt in ~/Mail ('cd Mail;mutt;cd').
--
Holger Lillqvist
On Jul 21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>if (bol_fsearch (">--"))
Actually there should be a space after the dashes:
if (bol_fsearch (">-- "))
Regards,
Holger
I received a mail with a large attachment which I cannot read. The
headers are as follows:
[-- Attachment #3: Rich Text Format --]
[-- Type: application/RTF, Encoding: base64, Size: 127K --]
Any ideas what I should add to my .mailcap to make the thing readable?
Holger
On Jan 8, Hanspeter Roth wrote:
> It seems to me send-hook ~t is not working with autoedit and
> edit_headers set.
> This is a bug, isn't it?
Why should it be considered a bug? Autoedit per definition skips
the send-menu, and as the recipient is still unknown when you enter
the editor, send-hoo
On Jan 8, Hanspeter Roth wrote:
> Why not reevaluate the send-hooks after the editing session and after
> changing the recipient in the compose menu?
For instance, send-hooks can be used to insert different signatures
matching certain addresses (inserting sigs in different languages,
etc.). Re-
On Jan 10, Nick Wilson wrote:
> When I hit 'c' and navigate to a mailbox, how do I get back to
> /var/spool/mail/nick? It's an awfully painfull task to navigate right
> up to the spool again. I usually restart mutt, but this surely isn't
> right?
I think you should check the section on folder sh
On Feb 8, David Clarke wrote:
> I'm just wondering if it's possible to have multiple postponed
> messages, as whenever I try to compose a new message, it loads the
> previously postponed message.
Sure it is posible to have multiple postponed msgs.
You must have the quadoption 'postpone' set
On Feb 22, johnathan spectre wrote:
> * David Collantes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [022102 11:06]:
>
> > Hi there!
> >
> > How can I create form letters on Mutt? Is that implemented? I have
> > looked around but found nothing.
>
> AFAIK Mutt can't do this itself, but if you could always create some
> so
On Mar 3, Charles Jie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 02, 2002 at 09:46:11PM -0500, parv wrote:
> > i am also using 1.3.27i version, but i don't see "tag-thread" action
> > in "help" in pager context, only "tag-message". are you sure that,
> > by chance you didn't see "tag-thread" in in
On Mar 10, Maik Holtkamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just spend the weekend by trying to bind edit in compose menu like
> the manual told me:
>
> 6.4.7
> edit e edit the message
>
> Since mutt did not stop complaining for:
>
> bind compose edit
>
> I asked in my di
On Mar 24, Russell Hoover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there any way of telling mutt to execute an interactive command
> (e.g. collapse-all) in .muttrc short of using push?
Sure. There is exec, which is used with named commands, not in
key-stroke macros. For example:
folder-hook !"!"
On Apr 11, Ken Weingold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > IIRC mutt just sets the Fcc as for any "normal" mail.
>
> So what was fixed in 1.3.28?
Resend-message now honors $record and fcc-hooks.
Holger
On Apr 13, Flavien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [The one above does not work. I suppose you thought :
> macro pager 'd' ''
>
> This one has a problem.
> Test case :
> N Subject: Foo
> N Subject: Bar
> N Subject: Gee
>
> Your press Enter to read Foo, then you press
On Jun 5, John P Verel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I note that if I resend a message from, say, my outbox by doing ESC e to
> open it, edit and send the new message, no copy of the newly edited and
> sent message is placed in my outbox. Is there a way to change this
> behavior?
Since 1.3.28 re
Hi,
Ï'm not certain this is the right forum to ask this question.. anyway.
I recently switched Linux distribution (from Debian Sarge to Ubuntu
Feisty) and since that I've the following problem printing mutt
attachments using openoffice (mostly doc-attachments): my system is
unable to use a runnin
On Sep 18, Gary Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I upgraded to Red Hat Enterprise Linux WS release 4 some months ago
> and had a similar problem. I fixed it by changing that line to
> this:
>
>application/msword; mutt_rem_bgrun openoffice.org-2.1 -view %s
>
> I need the "mutt_rem_bgrun
21 matches
Mail list logo
