mail archives

2001-01-03 Thread Duncan Sargeant
Greetings mutt friends, Can anyone help me find some mutt-user lore of old? The egroups archive goes back to mid 1998, but I'm looking for some messages I would have sent in 1996 or 1997? I would have copies, except I had a send-hook at the time which disabled my Fcc for any archived lists. Oh

Re: Empty To: field

1999-02-16 Thread Duncan Sargeant
Martin Julian DeMello wrote on Mon February 15, at 23:50 -0600: > Back when I was using Pine, I was able to bcc a mail to a bunch of adresses, > and have the To: field fill itsef in as "Undisclosed Recipients" or whatever. > No amount of rtfming has enabled me to do this with mutt - is it possible

Re: AOL e-mail protocol (slightly off top)

1999-03-27 Thread Duncan Sargeant
David Thorburn-Gundlach wrote on Fri March 26, at 10:27 -0500: > JULIAN -- > > ...and then Julian L.C. Brown said... > % > % >Anyone know what protocol AOL uses for e-mail or where I could find > % >out more information? I'd like to grab those users e-mail who have > % >AOL accounts and feed in

Re: maildirs and erratic behaviour?

1999-05-04 Thread Duncan Sargeant
Thomas Roessler wrote on Sat May 01, at 19:28 +0200: > there was a long-standing problem with mutt losing index position > and even attribute settings when new messages were delivered to > maildir folders. This should be fixed in 0.95 and 0.96, but > nevertheless, I've been seeing some reports co

empty headers

1999-06-01 Thread Duncan Sargeant
Hiya. I'm looking for a way to put empty headers in an email messages so that when I compose a new message, the header fields are there for me. I thought I could do this using my_hdr but I'm apparently wrong. I couldn't find anything in the manual. I example of what I want to do is: my_hdr X-T

Re: empty headers

1999-06-02 Thread Duncan Sargeant
rfi from Rich Roth wrote on Wed June 02, at 07:21 -0400: > On Tue, Jun 01, 1999 at 11:13:07AM +0800, Duncan Sargeant wrote: > > I'm looking for a way to put empty headers in an email messages so that > > when I compose a new message, the header fields are there for me. >