On 12/16/2012 10:37 AM, John Long wrote:
> Is there any way to retrieve pop mail automatically in mutt itself rather
> than using fetchmail etc.?
>
> Thanks.
>
> /jl
>
The short answer is "yes". The long answer is, maybe, if your
particular Mutt is compiled with the POP support option.
You will
On 12/17/2012 05:38 PM, Woody Wu wrote:
> Hi, List
>
> From help menu I don't see any search method other than '/'. I think
> there must be some method allowing user to search messages by sender,
> receipt, or even regular expression in body.
>
> How should I do this? Thanks.
>
>
I believe the
I sign most of my messages, even though I only know a few people who
actively use GnuPG/PGP. As I see it, this is one way of promoting
encryption. I.e.: "What is that block of gibberish you have at the end
of your emails?" "That, my friend is my public key. If you have the
right software you ca
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
You could make an archive of the files and call it something like
sisterphotos.tar.gz. This is what I do when I am sending more than
two or three attachments.
This way you only have one file to attach. The downside is that the
recipient must have ap
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
If it's sensitive
> enough to be encrypted outgoing, it's sensitive enough to be
> encrypted on disk... even if you haven't actually sent it yet.
>
Well, its easy enough to encrypt the whole disk with modern OS's, so
if the message is on your machine
I'm not an expert, but shouldn't mutt call /home/jan/.gnupg?
--
"Nothing is ever so bad that it couldn't be worse, and if it could be
worse than it is, then maybe its not so bad!"
I'm not an expert, but there is a work around I think will work. You
can store your keys on a flash drive... and possibly the entire OS for
that matter. If you do this, you have no problems.
Alternatively, you can encrypt a document and send it as an
attachment. Your fellow international spy ty
