t yes, I'm using MH style mailboxes, and filtering mailing
lists and such into them with procmail. I may be able to answer some of
your questions, just let me know.
--
Conrad Sabatier
http://members.home.net/conrads/
ICQ# 1147270
cribed to the mailing list, and yet
> already I've seen other references to problems with new mail
> detection, even for those not using mh mailboxes. Perhaps 1.1.7 will
> resolve this? Haven't had time to download it yet, but it might be
> worth a try.
Same here. I do intend to give it a try as soon as I have the time to set
it up. :-)
--
Conrad Sabatier
http://members.home.net/conrads/
ICQ# 1147270
On 01-Mar-00 Thomas Roessler wrote:
> On 2000-03-01 07:15:28 -0600, Conrad Sabatier wrote:
>
>> Yes, I've noticed that mutt behaves in a rather unreliable
>> fashion when it comes to this, too.
>
> The mh code is far from perfect. It should be fine for converting
On Thu, Mar 02, 2000 at 08:18:29AM +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> On 2000-03-01 19:08:10 -0600, Conrad Sabatier wrote:
>
> > By the way, is there a simple way to convert my existing folders
> > to this format?
>
> Just set mbox_type=maildir in mutt, go into an old fo
, my version of procmail
supports the folder/ syntax, so changing my .procmailrc was a snap, too.
The more I use and learn about this progrma, the more I like it! What trn
is to news, mutt is to mail. :-)
Thanks again, everyone.
--
Conrad Sabatier
http://members.home.net/conrads/
ICQ# 1147270