RE: mutt and mh/procmail

2000-02-29 Thread Conrad Sabatier
t yes, I'm using MH style mailboxes, and filtering mailing lists and such into them with procmail. I may be able to answer some of your questions, just let me know. -- Conrad Sabatier http://members.home.net/conrads/ ICQ# 1147270

Re: mutt and mh/procmail

2000-03-01 Thread Conrad Sabatier
cribed to the mailing list, and yet > already I've seen other references to problems with new mail > detection, even for those not using mh mailboxes. Perhaps 1.1.7 will > resolve this? Haven't had time to download it yet, but it might be > worth a try. Same here. I do intend to give it a try as soon as I have the time to set it up. :-) -- Conrad Sabatier http://members.home.net/conrads/ ICQ# 1147270

Re: mutt and mh/procmail

2000-03-01 Thread Conrad Sabatier
On 01-Mar-00 Thomas Roessler wrote: > On 2000-03-01 07:15:28 -0600, Conrad Sabatier wrote: > >> Yes, I've noticed that mutt behaves in a rather unreliable >> fashion when it comes to this, too. > > The mh code is far from perfect. It should be fine for converting

Re: mutt and mh/procmail

2000-03-02 Thread Conrad Sabatier
On Thu, Mar 02, 2000 at 08:18:29AM +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote: > On 2000-03-01 19:08:10 -0600, Conrad Sabatier wrote: > > > By the way, is there a simple way to convert my existing folders > > to this format? > > Just set mbox_type=maildir in mutt, go into an old fo

Re: mutt and mh/procmail

2000-03-04 Thread Conrad Sabatier
, my version of procmail supports the folder/ syntax, so changing my .procmailrc was a snap, too. The more I use and learn about this progrma, the more I like it! What trn is to news, mutt is to mail. :-) Thanks again, everyone. -- Conrad Sabatier http://members.home.net/conrads/ ICQ# 1147270