/rfc822
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-Path:
Received: (from gibby@localhost)
by werich.enteract.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id UAA00923
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 1 Jun 2000 20:15:49 -0500
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2000 20:15:49 -0500
From: Andrew Eichmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Timothy Ball proclaimed on mutt-users that:
>Fetchmail is frowned upon because of the fact that fetchamil basically
>runs as a deamon.
What's wrong with that?
Andy Eichmann
Hello,
When I thread mailing list messages, often the thread will be broken
up because of differing versions and placement of ``Re:'' in the
subject line, compounded by different mail clients' handling of
the subject line. For example, if the original message's Subject:
line is ``[BOB] What's
On Sat, Jun 17, 2000 at 09:58:44PM -0400, David T-G wrote:
> Andrew --
>
> I don't have an easy answer for your question, though procmail springs to
> mind for starters. You mentioned searching the manual; did you find
> $reply_regexp and see what you can do with it? It's pretty fancy...
Here
On Sat, Jun 17, 2000 at 09:59:30PM -0500, David Champion wrote:
> I warn you now - this is more than you asked for.
Yep, it is. ;-)
Thanks anyway.
>
> On 2000.06.17, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> "Andrew Eichmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
On Sat, Jun 17, 2000 at 11:54:18PM -0700, Eugene Lee wrote:
>
> Threads are usually broken because someone's mailer doeesn't generate
> any useful trackable header like Message-ID, References, or In-Reply-To.
> I would rather get the person to use a better client, or smack her/his
> ISP to add th
On Sat, Nov 17, 2001 at 07:57:04AM -0500, Bela Bartok wrote:
>
> I just dont want to use sendmail, if i am sending a big email, and i
> disconnect, it will stay in sendmail queue, and i dont want that. I want
> to the simpler, bert solution for desktop freebsd machine for handling
> emails
