Re: Going GUI...er

On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 06:57:14PM +0100, Sam Kuper wrote: > > When you're talking about a population of people, who is being > > inconsiderate, those who do what the majority prefer, or the minority > > who have made up their own mind that their way is better despite > > what everyone else does? >

Re: Inline PGP Within HTML

On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 01:46:26PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > Yeah, I've been trying to explain this to some folks around here > > recently, but not having much success. You have my sympathy. > > Agreed. It is frustrating. But Derek, please don't give up! I gave up a LOOONG time ago. Like

Re: Going GUI...er

On 2020-05-02, Derek Martin wrote: > On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 06:57:14PM +0100, Sam Kuper wrote: >> Moreover, you appear to be committing the logical fallacy called >> "argumentum ad populum" (aka "majoritarianism"). > > No, because accepted practice is determined by the majority (in this > case o

Re: Going GUI...er

Il 02 maggio 2020 alle 10:51 Derek Martin ha scritto: > In practice, it isn't really. The obvious "solution" is to render the > message [...] I understand that plain-text vs. html has a (tangential) relevance to the topic at hand, but this link is getting more and more tenuous as the Re:'s pile u

Re: Going Offtopic [was: Going GUI...er]

Il 02 maggio 2020 alle 10:51 Derek Martin ha scritto: > In practice, it isn't really. The obvious "solution" is to render the > message [...] I understand that plain-text vs. html has a (tangential) relevance to the topic at hand, but this link is getting more and more tenuous as the Re:'s pile u

Re: Elimination of mime/html part

On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 03:27:29PM +0100, Sam Kuper wrote: > Unfortunately, one of the weaknesses in Python's email handling (which > might be related to some ambiguities or flaws in the RFCs on which they > are based - I'm not sure) relates to the problem of identifying a > "primary" (for want of

Re: Going GUI...er

On Sat, May 02, 2020 at 04:16:45PM -, Grant Edwards wrote: > Insisting that the world switch from HTML to plaintext for e-mail is > just tilting at a windmill. I don't insist that the world switch from HTML to plaintext. I do ask that, at least, compatibility be maintained. (By a similar tok

Re: Going GUI...er

disclaimer: I have not reviewed this thread in its entirety. Grant Edwards wrote on Sat, 2 May 2020 at 12:16:45 EDT in : > _Nobody_ I work with uses an email client that properly displays > plaintext as sent by mutt. ... > Most of my family and friends do almost all of their e-mail on phones. >

mutt 1.14.0 released

Hi Mutt Users, I'm pleased to announce the release of version 1.14.0. Instructions for downloading are available at , or the tarball can be directly downloaded from . Please take the time to verify the signature file against m