On 19-11-01 11:37, martin f krafft wrote:
> Regarding the following, written by “Stefan Hagen” on 2019-11-01 at
> 08:53 Uhr +0100:
>
> While I was able to just write an email and send it, it is now a
> process of carefully “coding” an email, previewing, correcting,
> previewing, sendin
Regarding the following, written by "Martin Trautmann" on 2019-11-02 at 10:22
Uhr +0100:
However, the usage of blockquote within HTML is something where
there is not necessarily a proper way of handling this -
Thunderbird does not do it properly, as you see above. How does
handle html itself n
Regarding the following, written by "martin f krafft" on 2019-11-02 at 23:40
Uhr +1300:
How does this message fare? I’ve hacked up
my script so that it actually keeps the ‘>’
even in the HTML, but uses CSS to hide it.
Yeah, so I am not convinced at all, because all the html2text
converters w
> […] virtually all of the people who use mutt either as their only
> email client or along with others, chose mutt because of its
> simplicity.
People who want a simple text mail client will use Alpine or similar.
Mutt's possibly the most “complicated” text MUA.
I don't use mutt because of its
Sorry, I'm coming into this late.
Early on, Kevin McCarthy said:
Native support for multipart/alternative composition isn't in my todo
list.
Too bad -- that would be conceptually clean, to generate
multipart/alternative as part of composition.
Mutt runs an external text editor to compose p
