I have been using mutt for many, many years with a local (Unix style)
mail spool. Mail is delivered to my system by SMTP (postfix locally).
At the moment to access my mail remotely I ssh into the server and run
mutt. This works well in general but there are some disadvantages, in
particular the
* Chris Green [12-08-14 10:21]:
> I have been using mutt for many, many years with a local (Unix style)
> mail spool. Mail is delivered to my system by SMTP (postfix locally).
>
> At the moment to access my mail remotely I ssh into the server and run
> mutt. This works well in general but there
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 10:30:46AM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * Chris Green [12-08-14 10:21]:
> > I have been using mutt for many, many years with a local (Unix style)
> > mail spool. Mail is delivered to my system by SMTP (postfix locally).
> >
> > At the moment to access my mail remotely
* Chris Green [12-08-14 10:40]:
> On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 10:30:46AM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> > * Chris Green [12-08-14 10:21]:
> > > I have been using mutt for many, many years with a local (Unix style)
> > > mail spool. Mail is delivered to my system by SMTP (postfix locally).
> > >
>
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 11:12:27AM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * Chris Green [12-08-14 10:40]:
> > > I work somewhat similarily. I store all mail on my local box and maintain
> > > a tmux session which I access remotely via ssh -X. I can view html using
> > > the home machine's browser remo
* Chris Green [12-08-14 11:52]:
> On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 11:12:27AM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
[...]
> > >From *outside* I utilize fish:///local/directory/...
> > Usually the html files are not that large and doing the transfer in the
> > background, you can continue doing something else rat
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 12:15:06PM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * Chris Green [12-08-14 11:52]:
> > On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 11:12:27AM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> [...]
> > > >From *outside* I utilize fish:///local/directory/...
> > > Usually the html files are not that large and doing t
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 03:19:55PM +, Chris Green wrote:
> I have been using mutt for many, many years with a local (Unix style)
> mail spool. Mail is delivered to my system by SMTP (postfix locally).
>
> At the moment to access my mail remotely I ssh into the server and run
> mutt.
I suspec
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 03:19:55PM +, Chris Green wrote:
> I have been using mutt for many, many years with a local (Unix style)
> mail spool. Mail is delivered to my system by SMTP (postfix locally).
>
> At the moment to access my mail remotely I ssh into the server and run
> mutt. This wor
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 06:33:40PM +, John Long wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 03:19:55PM +, Chris Green wrote:
> > I have been using mutt for many, many years with a local (Unix style)
> > mail spool. Mail is delivered to my system by SMTP (postfix locally).
> >
> > At the moment to ac
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 06:40:15PM -0300, Eduardo Alvarez wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 03:19:55PM +, Chris Green wrote:
> > I have been using mutt for many, many years with a local (Unix style)
> > mail spool. Mail is delivered to my system by SMTP (postfix locally).
> >
> > At the moment
* Chris Green [2014-12-08 17:09 -0500]:
Doesn't anyone use IMAP? I must admit when I tried it (a few times
over the years, but not very recently) it never felt quite as easy and
transparent as using mutt on a local mail spool.
I stopped using IMAP directly a while ago, and started using offli
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 09:59:17PM +, Chris Green wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 06:33:40PM +, John Long wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 03:19:55PM +, Chris Green wrote:
> > > I have been using mutt for many, many years with a local (Unix style)
> > > mail spool. Mail is delivered
The pron spammers are at it again on a bunch of email lists I subscribe
to. I noticed most if not all of this reprehensible lot is using mail hosts
that use email addresses and also generate a message-id in the form of
Obnoxious Spammer
I have tried a few combinations but nothing works properly.
On 08Dec2014 22:04, Chris Green wrote:
Doesn't anyone use IMAP? I must admit when I tried it (a few times
over the years, but not very recently) it never felt quite as easy and
transparent as using mutt on a local mail spool.
I would advocate trying offlineimap. I am a huge fan of having one'
On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 07:15:13AM +, John Long wrote:
> The pron spammers are at it again on a bunch of email lists I subscribe
> to. I noticed most if not all of this reprehensible lot is using mail hosts
> that use email addresses and also generate a message-id in the form of
> Obnoxious Spa
16 matches
Mail list logo
