[- Wed 20.Mar'13 at 18:08:49 -0500 David Champion :-]
> * On 20 Mar 2013, Chris Green wrote:
> >
> > Has the mutt handling of this changed in the last few versions?
>
> Not that I know of, and I doubt it.
>
> > The python way of doing this is correct according to the RFC as fa
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 09:25:49AM +, James Griffin wrote:
> [- Wed 20.Mar'13 at 18:08:49 -0500 David Champion :-]
>
> > * On 20 Mar 2013, Chris Green wrote:
> > >
> > > Has the mutt handling of this changed in the last few versions?
> >
> > Not that I know of, and I doubt
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 11:45:22AM +1100, raf wrote:
>
> the python code needs to be changed to write the "From " header, then
the
> message, then the blank line.
>
Then it appears to be a bug in the Python mailbox library code. I have
attached it here. If you look through you will see, in the mb
Hi,
I have this macro to archive messages:
macro pager,index Sl "~h'Return-Path:
'=Archive" "archive
messages"
But if no messages have been tagged then fails and the
currently hightlighted message gets archived.
What is the correct way to do it?
Thanks,
* On 21 Mar 2013, Louis-David Mitterrand wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have this macro to archive messages:
>
> macro pager,index Sl "~h'Return-Path:
> '=Archive" "archive
> messages"
>
> But if no messages have been tagged then fails and the
> currently hightlighted message gets archived.
>
> What is
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 10:33:53AM -0500, David Champion wrote:
> * On 21 Mar 2013, Louis-David Mitterrand wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have this macro to archive messages:
> >
> > macro pager,index Sl "~h'Return-Path:
> > '=Archive"
> > "archive messages"
> >
> > But if no messages have been tag
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 06:08:49PM -0500, David Champion wrote:
> There absolutely should be a blank line. I think though that the order
> is wrong: mutt expects that a message (i.e. a From_ line) appears at
> the old EOF marker, and that the EOF marker is on/after a blank line.
> I think that if
