--> David Woodfall [2013-02-06 21:59:48 +]:
> Is there a way of 1) Doing a 'limit' in the index, which shows only
> folders with new mail, or 2) A file-mask that I can use to do the
> same?
>
> Man page and google didn't find anything, and I tried making a macro
> for limit for the index but
--> David Woodfall [2013-02-06 21:55:46 +]:
> On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 08:14:24AM +, James Griffin
> put forth the proposition:
> >--> David Woodfall [2013-02-05 18:46:56 +]:
> >
> >>>And I think I've found a problem with my mailboxes commands. When I
> >>>tried changing the mailbox
On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 08:17:41AM +, James Griffin
put forth the proposition:
--> David Woodfall [2013-02-06 21:55:46 +]:
On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 08:14:24AM +, James Griffin
put forth the proposition:
>--> David Woodfall [2013-02-05 18:46:56 +]:
>
>>>And I think I've foun
On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 08:01:21AM +, James Griffin
put forth the proposition:
--> David Woodfall [2013-02-06 21:59:48 +]:
Is there a way of 1) Doing a 'limit' in the index, which shows only
folders with new mail, or 2) A file-mask that I can use to do the
same?
Man page and google
--> David Woodfall [2013-02-07 08:44:34 +]:
> On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 08:01:21AM +, James Griffin
> put forth the proposition:
> >--> David Woodfall [2013-02-06 21:59:48 +]:
> >
> >>Is there a way of 1) Doing a 'limit' in the index, which shows only
> >>folders with new mail, or 2)
On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 09:33:00AM +, James Griffin
put forth the proposition:
--> David Woodfall [2013-02-07 08:44:34 +]:
On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 08:01:21AM +, James Griffin
put forth the proposition:
>--> David Woodfall [2013-02-06 21:59:48 +]:
>
>>Is there a way of 1) D
On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 09:40:43AM +, David Woodfall
put forth the proposition:
On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 09:33:00AM +, James Griffin
put forth the proposition:
--> David Woodfall [2013-02-07 08:44:34 +]:
On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 08:01:21AM +, James Griffin
put forth the pr
On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 08:44:34AM +, David Woodfall wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 08:01:21AM +, James Griffin
> put forth the proposition:
> >--> David Woodfall [2013-02-06 21:59:48 +]:
> No it works fine now. Just trying out a couple of shell scripts
> similar to Andre's, but mu
On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 10:47:57AM +0100, Andre Klärner
put forth the proposition:
On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 08:44:34AM +, David Woodfall wrote:
On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 08:01:21AM +, James Griffin
put forth the proposition:
>--> David Woodfall [2013-02-06 21:59:48 +]:
No it works
--> David Woodfall [2013-02-07 08:37:46 +]:
...
> Yes, I know, but it doesn't say that most of them don't work with
> IMAP.
Yes, having had another look I tend to agree with you; the printf
sequences that are not imap campatible aren't specified as such. Not all
of them anyway.
Jamie
--
Hi David,
On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 09:55:55AM +, David Woodfall wrote:
> Seems to work fine for me, although I'm guessing a bit at how
> individual email files are named when new. For instance, some
> end in my hostname and some end in a ','.
well, those ending in your hostname are probaply in
On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 02:23:03PM +0100, Andre Klärner
put forth the proposition:
Hi David,
On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 09:55:55AM +, David Woodfall wrote:
Seems to work fine for me, although I'm guessing a bit at how
individual email files are named when new. For instance, some
end in my ho
I use for my regular inbox:
set index_format="%4C %Z [%-25.25n] [%d] (%?M?C%3M&%4c?) %s"
and I try to use this for my Sent folder to display the TO address
in my Sent folder instead of my FROM address.
folder-hook Sent 'set index_format="%4C %Z [%-25.25t] [%d] \
(%?M?C%3M&%4c?) %s"'
However
Hi Torsten,
* Torsten Flammiger [07. Feb. 2013]:
> I use for my regular inbox:
> set index_format="%4C %Z [%-25.25n] [%d] (%?M?C%3M&%4c?) %s"
>
> and I try to use this for my Sent folder to display the TO address
> in my Sent folder instead of my FROM address.
>
> folder-hook Sent 'set index_f
On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 10:11:22PM +0100, Torsten Flammiger wrote:
> I use for my regular inbox:
> set index_format="%4C %Z [%-25.25n] [%d] (%?M?C%3M&%4c?) %s"
>
> and I try to use this for my Sent folder to display the TO address
> in my Sent folder instead of my FROM address.
>
> folder-hook
Am 08.02.2013 02:32, schrieb Gregor Zattler:
Hi Torsten,
[...]
Perhaps I did something wrong.
You'll have to teach mutt to switch back to your "normal" index
format, when switchin mailboxes:
folder-hook . 'set index_format="%4C %Z [%-25.25n] [%d]
(%?M?C%3M&%4c?) %s"'
ahh, that makes sen
16 matches
Mail list logo
