* On 15 Dec 2012, Erik Christiansen wrote:
> On 15.12.12 17:03, Christian Brabandt wrote:
> > Probably it is not yet in mutt, but might be included later. Many
> > features from mutt started as separate patches (or are still flying
> > around as patches) until they have been included into main m
Is there any way to retrieve pop mail automatically in mutt itself rather
than using fetchmail etc.?
Thanks.
/jl
--
ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) Powered by Lemote Fuloong
against HTML e-mail X Loongson MIPS and OpenBSD
and proprietary/ \http://www.mutt.org
attachments /
On 12/16/2012 10:37 AM, John Long wrote:
> Is there any way to retrieve pop mail automatically in mutt itself rather
> than using fetchmail etc.?
>
> Thanks.
>
> /jl
>
The short answer is "yes". The long answer is, maybe, if your
particular Mutt is compiled with the POP support option.
You will
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 11:37:29AM -0600, Dale Raby wrote:
> On 12/16/2012 10:37 AM, John Long wrote:
> > Is there any way to retrieve pop mail automatically in mutt itself rather
> > than using fetchmail etc.?
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > /jl
> >
> The short answer is "yes". The long answer is, maybe
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 10:30:56AM -0600, David Champion wrote:
>
> In the end, the tags are just put back by the MLM anyway, so the only
> thing this did for me (vs an MUA-only solution) was to save me from
> looking at the tags in my editor. Now I just hide the tag in my index
> view. Much che
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 12:00:25PM +1100, Erik Christiansen wrote:
> On 15.12.12 17:03, Christian Brabandt wrote:
> That has the advantage that the [list-gumpf] is gone not only from the
> index, but also from the edit-headers in vim, when replying.
It also has the disadvantage that the [list-gump
On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 11:44:17PM +1300, Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 07:43:12PM -0600, Derek Martin wrote:
> > Same arguemnt as above. Also this is mostly not interesting
> > anymore. When you compare this to the amount of bandwidth consumed
> > by things like streaming vide
* Dale Raby [12-16-12 12:40]:
[...]
> You might wish to consider using IMAP instead. This protocol keeps the
> message on the server where you can access it again from, say, the
> computer at the public library. POP3 will also allow this, but it is
> not the default behavior in most cases.
Or
Dale wrote:
> http://www.mutt.org/doc/manual/manual-4.html
>
> Item 4.10
>
> I think the item you want is the pop_checkinterval variable
>
> The default is 60 seconds
Thanks I just tried that after I posted my previous response. It doesn't
work either (but it sure looked like it should!)
On 16.12.12 12:20, Derek Martin wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 12:00:25PM +1100, Erik Christiansen wrote:
> > On 15.12.12 17:03, Christian Brabandt wrote:
> > That has the advantage that the [list-gumpf] is gone not only from the
> > index, but also from the edit-headers in vim, when replying.
>
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 12:15:49PM -0600, Derek Martin wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 11:44:17PM +1300, Chris Bannister wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 07:43:12PM -0600, Derek Martin wrote:
> > > Same arguemnt as above. Also this is mostly not interesting
> > > anymore. When you compare this
11 matches
Mail list logo
