Re: Procmail threads filtering with notmuch

2012-10-11 Thread Alexis Letessier
Hi Will, Thanks again for your ideas. On 04/10/12 16:04, Will Fiveash wrote: > I use procmail and some shell scripts to basically do the same. Here is > my .procmail rule: > > # Process killed threads, save killed threads in killedthreads mbox > :0: > * ? $HOME/bin/isthreadkilled > killedthread

Re: Procmail threads filtering with notmuch

2012-10-11 Thread Will Fiveash
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 10:12:16PM +0200, Alexis Letessier wrote: > Hi Will, > > Thanks again for your ideas. > > On 04/10/12 16:04, Will Fiveash wrote: > > I use procmail and some shell scripts to basically do the same. Here is > > my .procmail rule: > > > > # Process killed threads, save kill

Re: Procmail threads filtering with notmuch

2012-10-11 Thread Alexis Letessier
You're right Will, I have used tr and sed expressions from Marco and only a part of your procmail recipe (* ? script). Thanks to you two then ;) On 11/10/12 15:30, Will Fiveash wrote: > I don't see my script stuff in there so I'm thinking you probably need > to redirect your thanks to Marco. I

Re: Procmail threads filtering with notmuch

2012-10-11 Thread M. Fioretti
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 22:43:39 PM +0200, Alexis Letessier wrote: > You're right Will, > > I have used tr and sed expressions from Marco and only a part of > your procmail recipe (* ? script). > > Thanks to you two then ;) You're welcome! Glad the stuff was useful. For the record, the procmail r

Re: Procmail threads filtering with notmuch

2012-10-11 Thread J Wermont
M. Fioretti wrote: > You're welcome! Glad the stuff was useful. For the record, the > procmail recipe in my blog post is NOT mine (as duly noted in the post > itself and/or in the code). Basically, I had the idea, then whined on > the procmail list about it until Sean Straw, procmail guru, bec

Re: Procmail threads filtering with notmuch

2012-10-11 Thread M. Fioretti
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 14:39:28 PM -0700, J Wermont wrote: > M. Fioretti wrote: > > > You're welcome! Glad the stuff was useful. For the record, the > > procmail recipe in my blog post is NOT mine (as duly noted in the post > > itself and/or in the code). Basically, I had the idea, then whined on