Killfiling, anyone?

2012-07-25 Thread John Long
Guys, what are you using for killfiling/mail filtering? I am using Mutt's built in POP and SMTP at this point, is there any way to killfile emails based on header contents? Scoring won't be enough, I want to delete this crap as the email is being downloaded from my mail provider. I am not looking

Re: Thank you for Mutt

2012-07-25 Thread Jim Graham
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 06:29:33PM +0100, Joe McCool wrote: > On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 6:19 PM, wrote: > > > > > Thanks to all the Mutt developers, contributors, and user > > > community. Mutt is a great app! It doesn't suck at all. > > > > > Joining in! Really, Mutt is absolutely the best email c

Re: Thank you for Mutt

2012-07-25 Thread Jim Graham
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 04:17:59AM -0500, Jim Graham wrote: > As will I. :-) Forgot one thing: I've been using Mutt since right around the time it went from alpha to beta status, ca 1995, I think, and have never had even the slightest regret. It has, simply, always been the best for me. On on

Re: Thank you for Mutt

2012-07-25 Thread Jim Graham
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 01:00:28AM +0200, Andre Kl?rner wrote: > Well, what do you mean with that? I also noticed that sometimes the > fullscreen running mutt looks a bit unusual when you use 80 of your 250 > columns. But how would you think could one make it better? I'm not sure what you're desc

Re: Thank you for Mutt

2012-07-25 Thread Jim Graham
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 11:11:03AM +1000, Cameron Simpson wrote: > On 24Jul2012 15:20, Aaron Toponce wrote: > | - No ability to change signatures when changing accounts automatically. > > Well, mutt doesn't have "accounts". It has individual settings for a > bunch of things, which would norm

Re: Killfiling, anyone?

2012-07-25 Thread Jim Graham
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 08:48:08AM +, John Long wrote: > Guys, what are you using for killfiling/mail filtering? procmail. There's no substitute, IMHO. Later, --jim -- THE SCORE: ME: 2 CANCER: 0 73 DE N5IAL (/4) | Peter da Silva: No, try "rm -rf /" spooky1...@gmail.com

Re: Killfiling, anyone?

2012-07-25 Thread Andreas Kneib
* John Long schrieb am 25.07.2012 um 8:48 Uhr: > Guys, what are you using for killfiling/mail filtering? Procmail http://www.procmail.org/ http://www.ii.com/internet/robots/procmail/qs/ Andreas

Re: Killfiling, anyone?

2012-07-25 Thread ivo engelhardt
>From the Debian FAQ: muttrc: macro index"|grep "^^From:" | sed -e 's/ *(.*)//; s/>.*//; s/.*[:<] *//' \ >> $HOME/.spam && echo Add sender to killfile\n" "kill sender" macro pager"|grep "^^From:" | sed -e 's/ *(.*)//; s/>.*//; s/.*[:<] *//' \ >> $HOME/.spam &

Re: Killfiling, anyone?

2012-07-25 Thread John Long
That's three votes for procmail. I guess I will have to look into it! Thanks everybody. -- ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) Powered by Lemote Fuloong against HTML e-mail X Loongson MIPS and OpenBSD and proprietary/ \http://www.mutt.org attachmentsCode Blue or Go Home!

Re: Thank you for Mutt

2012-07-25 Thread John Long
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 04:33:13AM -0500, Jim Graham wrote: > On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 04:17:59AM -0500, Jim Graham wrote: > > On one list I'm on (the Chile-Heads list, fwiw), from time to time the > topic of replying to the list will come up, and the fact that most have > to do a reply-all to repl

Re: Killfiling, anyone?

2012-07-25 Thread Patrick Shanahan
* John Long [07-25-12 07:52]: > That's three votes for procmail. I guess I will have to look into it! 4 :^) -- (paka)Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USA HOG # US1244711 http://wahoo.no-ip.orgPhoto Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2 http://en.opensuse.org

Re: OT: MTA seems to delete header lines about Content-type

2012-07-25 Thread Mark E. Mallett
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 04:16:56PM +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote: > > Hello, > > I know, this a bit off-topic, but maybe someone of the mail Gurus has an > idea where to look... > > We are producing mails with UTF-8 encoded text body and a header line > telling > > Content-type text/plain;

Re: Killfiling, anyone?

2012-07-25 Thread Mark H. Wood
Well, here's one vote for maildrop (from a former procmail user). They're both good. And, since I use exim, I keep telling myself that someday I'm going to try its Sieve per-user filter support. -- Mark H. Wood, Lead System Programmer mw...@iupui.edu Asking whether markets are efficient is lik

Re: OT: MTA seems to delete header lines about Content-type

2012-07-25 Thread Matthias Apitz
El día Wednesday, July 25, 2012 a las 09:44:47AM -0400, Mark E. Mallett escribió: > On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 04:16:56PM +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > I know, this a bit off-topic, but maybe someone of the mail Gurus has an > > idea where to look... > > > > We are producing

Re: Killfiling, anyone?

2012-07-25 Thread Tim Gray
On Jul 25, 2012 at 10:26 AM -0400, Mark H. Wood wrote: Well, here's one vote for maildrop (from a former procmail user). They're both good. And, since I use exim, I keep telling myself that someday I'm going to try its Sieve per-user filter support. I use Sieve for this kind of thing. Downloa

Re: OT: MTA seems to delete header lines about Content-type

2012-07-25 Thread Mark E. Mallett
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 04:39:21PM +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote: > El d?a Wednesday, July 25, 2012 a las 09:44:47AM -0400, Mark E. Mallett > escribi?: > > > > Are you putting in a Mime-Version header field, or is that getting > > stripped too? (I don't see it in the example you appended) > > No,

Re: Killfiling, anyone?

2012-07-25 Thread stargrave
>> That's three votes for procmail. I guess I will have to look into it! >4 :^) And me too is voting for procmail of course ☺! So it is 5.

Re: Killfiling, anyone?

2012-07-25 Thread Christian Brabandt
Hi John! On Mi, 25 Jul 2012, John Long wrote: > Guys, what are you using for killfiling/mail filtering? > > I am using Mutt's built in POP and SMTP at this point, is there any way to > killfile emails based on header contents? Scoring won't be enough, I want to > delete this crap as the email is

Re: OT: MTA seems to delete header lines about Content-type

2012-07-25 Thread Matthias Apitz
El día Wednesday, July 25, 2012 a las 12:49:31PM -0400, Mark E. Mallett escribió: > On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 04:39:21PM +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote: > > El d�a Wednesday, July 25, 2012 a las 09:44:47AM -0400, Mark E. Mallett > > escribi�: > > > > > > Are you putting in a Mime-Version header fiel

Re: OT: MTA seems to delete header lines about Content-type

2012-07-25 Thread Mark E. Mallett
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 08:58:32PM +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote: > El d??a Wednesday, July 25, 2012 a las 12:49:31PM -0400, Mark E. Mallett > escribi??: > > > On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 04:39:21PM +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote: > > > El d?a Wednesday, July 25, 2012 a las 09:44:47AM -0400, Mark E. Malle

Re: OT: MTA seems to delete header lines about Content-type

2012-07-25 Thread Matthias Apitz
El día Wednesday, July 25, 2012 a las 03:28:11PM -0400, Mark E. Mallett escribió: > All rather far afield from mutt, though. > > mm Fully agreed. Thanks for pointing me into the right direction. matthias -- Matthias Apitz e - w http://www.unixarea.de/ UNIX since V7 on PDP-11, UNIX on