* P. Mazart [11-06-11 17:16]:
> are there any implementations or thoughts on subject encryption
> for PGP/MIME, yet?
an encrypted Subject would only be visible to the intended recipient
holdiong the correct key and only after he decrypted the post, so what
would be the point? Why would you send
Hi Patrick,
thank you for your answer!
Patrick Shanahan schrieb am 07.11.2011 13:21:37:
> an encrypted Subject would only be visible to the intended recipient
> holdiong the correct key and only after he decrypted the post, so what
> would be the point?
Avoiding inference about the email’s conte
On Nov 04, 2011 at 05:25 PM +0100, Jostein Berntsen wrote:
If you use mu search you can easily save your search to a new search folder by
just changing the folder path. Standard mu search:
mu find --clearlinks --format=links --linksdir=~/mail/search
Good idea. I never thought of changing the
If you were to somehow encrypt the subject and send the email, how would
you propose the recipient decrypts it?
Email subject line encryption just isn't a feature of PGP, per RFC
4880. Even if Mutt could do it, chances are very slim the client on the
other end would be able to decrypt it (I'm
I try to set different *index_format* for maials. like this:
message-hook "~g" "set index_format = ' A %H %C| +%N [%4Z] %-13L >> %s %>
%4c' " # signed
message-hook "~g" "set index_format = ' B %H %C| %N [%4Z] %-13L > %s %>
%4c' " # replied
This does not work. But folder-hook can set di
