Re: mairix search

2011-05-03 Thread Sebastian Tramp
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 06:00:04PM -0400, Ed Blackman wrote: > On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 02:08:33PM -0700, Omen Wild wrote: > >Quoting Ed Blackman on Fri, Apr 29 17:03: > >> > >>In my case, mairixquery is a Perl script that prompts me for the mairix > >>search string, gives me yes or no prompts for

Re: offlineimap much slower than gmail-imap

2011-05-03 Thread Scott Barker
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 12:03:46AM +0200, Jose M Vidal wrote: > I was happily using mutt with gmail-imap. > Then I decided to switch to offlineimap+msmtp, so I could still use > mutt offline, have a backup of all my e-mails and, hopefully, increase > mutt speed by working locally. > But, after havi

Re: mairix search

2011-05-03 Thread Tim Gray
On May 03, 2011 at 08:39 AM +0200, Jostein Berntsen wrote: I use mairix, but it seems like "mu" is being quite actively developed: Yes, mu is quite actively developed. I liked it a fair amount. I just have a feeling that notmuch has a brighter future.

Re: offlineimap much slower than gmail-imap

2011-05-03 Thread Jose M Vidal
Hi everybody. Thank you very much for your help. The situation now is: 1- As my /home folder is ecrypt I added to my .muttrc your suggestion (folder-hook 'archive' 'push ; unset maildir_header_cache_verify') Apparently, after a first refresh, the update of files looks inmediate, but after using m

Re: mairix search

2011-05-03 Thread Tim Gray
On May 03, 2011 at 08:47 AM +0200, Sebastian Tramp wrote: Sounds interesting. do you think, notmuch is faster than mairix (not that I have a problem with mairix speed, just for our information) It's been a while since I've used mairix. I forget exactly how long it took to index things initial

Re: offlineimap much slower than gmail-imap

2011-05-03 Thread Jose M Vidal
> What does the following command give you (assuming your disk is /dev/sda): > >    hdparm -tT /dev/sda jm@jm-ThinkPad-X200s:~$ sudo hdparm -tT /dev/sda6 /dev/sda6: Timing cached reads: 2738 MB in 2.00 seconds = 1370.52 MB/sec Timing buffered disk reads: 116 MB in 3.02 seconds = 38.45 MB/

quoted-printable not displaying correctly

2011-05-03 Thread Grant Edwards
I've noticed that pretty much all of the e-mail I get from MS Windows users is not being displayed correctly. The problem messages are multipart/alternative. There are two parts: The first is Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable The second is

Re: quoted-printable not displaying correctly

2011-05-03 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2011-05-03, Grant Edwards wrote: > I've noticed that pretty much all of the e-mail I get from MS Windows > users is not being displayed correctly. > > The problem messages are multipart/alternative. > > There are two parts: > > The first is > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > Cont