Re: rsync removes the "N" from mailboxes with new mail

2011-03-08 Thread Derek Martin
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 03:37:45PM -0800, John Magolske wrote: > After doing an rsync backup, the "N" preceding mailboxes with new mail > is removed from all mailboxes. I suppose this is a result of the mbox > files being touched somehow by the rsync process. Is there any way to > prevent this? Us

Re: rsync removes the "N" from mailboxes with new mail

2011-03-08 Thread Chris G
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 10:54:23AM -0600, Derek Martin wrote: > On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 03:37:45PM -0800, John Magolske wrote: > > After doing an rsync backup, the "N" preceding mailboxes with new mail > > is removed from all mailboxes. I suppose this is a result of the mbox > > files being touched

Re: rsync removes the "N" from mailboxes with new mail

2011-03-08 Thread Derek Martin
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 06:29:47PM +, Chris G wrote: > On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 10:54:23AM -0600, Derek Martin wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 03:37:45PM -0800, John Magolske wrote: > > > After doing an rsync backup, the "N" preceding mailboxes with new mail > > > is removed from all mailboxe

Re: rsync removes the "N" from mailboxes with new mail

2011-03-08 Thread Chris G
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 02:50:26PM -0600, Derek Martin wrote: > On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 06:29:47PM +, Chris G wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 10:54:23AM -0600, Derek Martin wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 03:37:45PM -0800, John Magolske wrote: > > > > After doing an rsync backup, the "N

Re: rsync removes the "N" from mailboxes with new mail

2011-03-08 Thread Derek Martin
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 09:11:59PM +, Chris G wrote: > On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 02:50:26PM -0600, Derek Martin wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 06:29:47PM +, Chris G wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 10:54:23AM -0600, Derek Martin wrote: > > > > On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 03:37:45PM -0800,

Re: rsync removes the "N" from mailboxes with new mail

2011-03-08 Thread John Magolske
* Chris G [110308 14:30]: > On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 02:50:26PM -0600, Derek Martin wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 06:29:47PM +, Chris G wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 10:54:23AM -0600, Derek Martin wrote: > > > > On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 03:37:45PM -0800, John Magolske wrote: > > > >