Something I've not seen in this thread: surely the header cache, if
used, will leak information onto your hard drive?
--
Cameron Simpson DoD#743
http://www.cskk.ezoshosting.com/cs/
Using encryption on the Internet is the equivalent of arranging an armored
car to deliver credit-card information f
* Kyle Wheeler wrote:
> It'll ask for my gpg password, decode it, etc. I can even then use
> gpg-agent to store my passphrase and allow me to quit and restart
> mutt multiple times without retyping the passphrase.
With regard to gpg/gpg-agent and hibernating check this:
http://lists.gnupg.org/p
Hello,
I meet with a problem sending emails with attachements by mutt.
simplly like this:
# code
uuencode file_name file_name > att.email
cat mail_message >> att.email
mutt -s "Subject" recei...@somewhere.net < att.email
with this script, I can send email with attachment very easy. and
gmail
On 11.05.10,15:50, Qi Zhang wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I meet with a problem sending emails with attachements by mutt.
> simplly like this:
>
> # code
> uuencode file_name file_name > att.email
>
> cat mail_message >> att.email
>
> mutt -s "Subject" recei...@somewhere.net < att.email
>
>
> with this
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 12:15:33PM +0200, Jostein Berntsen wrote:
On 11.05.10,15:50, Qi Zhang wrote:
# code
uuencode file_name file_name > att.email
cat mail_message >> att.email
mutt -s "Subject" recei...@somewhere.net < att.email
with this script, I can send email with attachment very easy.
Interesting responses! Thanks
Kyle's idea of doing GPG on-the-fly decryption is interesting. But my
question was, exactly what files do you need to decrypt? Obviously there
are the config files, and the header cache, and the body cache if you
have it turned on. Does mutt write information to any o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Tuesday, May 11 at 09:21 PM, quoth chombee:
> Does mutt write information to any other files? Mutt would need to
> be configured so that all files that it writes to are located in a
> GPG-encrypted directory, including even any temporary files t
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 07:33:43PM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
> So you're worried about the safety of deleted files? Disk encryption
> may not guarantee that the message is never stored in memory (and thus
> potentially swapped to disk) un-encrypted, so you definitely need
> encrypted swap space
Yes, because the attachments are generated by scripts then put into
different folders.
Each receiver has different amount of attachments.
redirect mail attachments to a single file is more easy than use "-a
file1 file2"
I plan to use mail -s "Subject" recei...@example.com < att.email (This
attachme
Does your version of mutt support the "-a" option which will generate
proper mime-compliant header?
Срд, 12 Май 2010, Qi Zhang писал(а):
> Yes, because the attachments are generated by scripts then put into
> different folders.
> Each receiver has different amount of attachments.
> redirect mail a
My Mutt version is 1.4.2, buildin with Centos 5.4
If I use -a option, everything goes well. But I should write more bash
scripts on how many attaments for each receiver, with the file name
and email address.
Zhang Qi
2010/5/12 bill lam :
> Does your version of mutt support the "-a" option whic
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 11:50:20AM +0800, Qi Zhang wrote:
> Yes, because the attachments are generated by scripts then put into
> different folders.
> Each receiver has different amount of attachments.
If I understand correctly, this is trivial to do with mutt in a
script, unless your attachment f
12 matches
Mail list logo
