Re: Delivering system mail

On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 08:57:47AM +0200, Tolga wrote: >>> >> Thanks for the response, Patrick. I get line two, but wouldn't line three >> of the >> recipe have to read $HOME/Mail/system/? >> >> Rem >> > Add MAILDIR=$HOME/Mail at the beginning of your .procmailrc and amend > the recipe

Re: Deleting imap mailbox

Ah, I was one tab away from victory! Thanks, that works! On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 01:18:42PM -0800, Brendan Cully wrote: > On Thursday, 29 January 2009 at 12:38, Nathan Huesken wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have setup mutt to check mails over imap ssl. > > Now I want to delete a mailbox. I press c-tab-

Re: Delivering system mail

* Tolga [01-30-09 01:59]: > > > Rem P Roberti yazmış: > >On 2009.01.29 20:12:32 +, Patrick Shanahan wrote: > >>:0: > >>* ^TO_.*root > >> system > >> > >> > >Thanks for the response, Patrick. I get line two, but wouldn't line three > >of the > >recipe have to read $HOME/Mail/system/? >

Re: Delivering system mail

* Patrick Shanahan [01-30-09 09:37]: > * Tolga [01-30-09 01:59]: > > > > > > Rem P Roberti yazmış: > > >On 2009.01.29 20:12:32 +, Patrick Shanahan wrote: > > >>:0: > > >>* ^TO_.*root > > >> system > > >> > > >> > > >Thanks for the response, Patrick. I get line two, but wouldn't line t

Re: Delivering system mail

On 2009.01.30 08:57:47 +, Tolga wrote: > > > Rem P Roberti yazm: > >On 2009.01.29 20:12:32 +, Patrick Shanahan wrote: > > > >>* Rem P Roberti [01-29-09 18:31]: > >> > >>>I have a mailbox (~/Mail/system) to which I would like my system mail to > >>>be placed. I haven't been abl

Re: Printing with Mutt

On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 10:50:16PM -0800, Rem P Roberti wrote: > > > > Here is a small tutorial for muttprint: > > http://www.linux-magazine.com/w3/issue/48/Formatting_Email_with_Muttprint.pdf Apologies for hijacking this thread, but I too was intrigued with the prospect of prettified mutt printi

Re: Printing with Mutt

On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 04:24:41PM +, Arthur Dent wrote: > What is "dialog" (I don't remember there being any dependencies > missing). most likely: -- Dr. Joost Kremers Goethe-Universität Institut für Kognitive Linguistik Grüneburgplatz

Re: Printing with Mutt

On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 06:47:07PM +0100, Joost Kremers wrote: > On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 04:24:41PM +, Arthur Dent wrote: > > What is "dialog" (I don't remember there being any dependencies > > missing). > > most likely: > > Thanks - You'r

Re: Printing with Mutt

> > I'm working on different computer, so I may have missed, but what do you > > have in .muttrc for print_command? > > OK, In .muttrc I have the following: > > set print_command="muttprint" > #set print="yes" > set print_split > > macro index p " > " > macro pager p " > " > > (Mind the lin

Re: Printing with Mutt

On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 12:11:51PM -0700, Michael wrote: > On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 06:15:13PM +, Arthur Dent wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 06:47:07PM +0100, Joost Kremers wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 04:24:41PM +, Arthur Dent wrote: > > I'm working on different computer, so I

Re: Printing with Mutt

On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 11:48:04AM -0800, Rem P Roberti wrote: > > > I just finished setting up Muttprint and I had to have set print="yes" > uncommented in my .muttrc, and also I had to change PRINT_COMMAND="lpr > -P$PRINTER" to > simply PRINT_COMMAND="lpr" in order for Muttprint to work. > Su

Re: detect from mailcap whether called for view or reply

I guess the answer is, "Nobody on the mutt-users list can think of a way to do this." Right? ;-) -Original Message- From: Aron Griffis [mailto:agrif...@n01se.net] Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2008 06:37 PM Subject: detect from mailcap whether called for view or reply Presently my mailca

Re: Printing with Mutt

On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 07:57:55PM +, Arthur Dent wrote: > On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 11:48:04AM -0800, Rem P Roberti wrote: > > > > > I just finished setting up Muttprint and I had to have set print="yes" > > uncommented in my .muttrc, and also I had to change PRINT_COMMAND="lpr > > -P$PRINTER"

Re: detect from mailcap whether called for view or reply

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday, January 30 at 04:15 PM, quoth Aron Griffis: >I guess the answer is, "Nobody on the mutt-users list can think >of a way to do this." Right? ;-) Right. There's nothing inherent in the mailcap mechanism that you can use for this. The closest

Re: detect from mailcap whether called for view or reply

Kyle Wheeler wrote: [Fri Jan 30 2009, 04:19:57PM EST] > The closest you may be able to get is to find a way to make > mutt export some environment variables so that you can make > your dumptext program detect what's going on. But that'll > require some hand-coding on your part, there's nothing I k

Re: How to configure mutt to accept an expired IMAP/SSL cert?

On 2009-01-26, Grant Edwards wrote: > On 2009-01-25, Grant Edwards wrote: >> On 2009-01-25, Brendan Cully wrote: >>> >>> mutt tip has a new $ssl_verify_dates flag. You could build from >>> mercurial, grab a nightly from http://dev.mutt.org/nightlies, or wait >>> for 1.5.20. >> >> Brilliant! I'l

question about saving emails

When I use the 's' key to save an email to a different mailbox, mutt responds with a suggested mailbox name to which the email can be moved. This is based on the contents of headers lines in the email, I think. Is this something that is set up with a save-hook? If yes, where is that save-hook defin

Re: How to configure mutt to accept an expired IMAP/SSL cert?

On 2009-01-30, Grant Edwards wrote: >> Last night's snapshot works perfectly so far. > > I just ran into a problem. The new version appears to be > converting '.' characters into '/' characters in IMAP mailbox > names. So now I can't access any of my mailboxes that have a > '.' in their names. :

Re: How to configure mutt to accept an expired IMAP/SSL cert?

On 2009-01-30, Grant Edwards wrote: > Found it. It looks like I need to set imap_delim_chars so that > it doesn't include '.'. FWIW, setting it to "" makes mutt segfault. Setting it to "/" appears to work. -- Grant Edwards grante Yow! CHUBBY CHECKER just

Re: question about saving emails

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday, January 30 at 03:26 PM, quoth Paul E Condon: > When I use the 's' key to save an email to a different mailbox, mutt > responds with a suggested mailbox name to which the email can be > moved. This is based on the contents of headers lines

Re: detect from mailcap whether called for view or reply

On 30Jan2009 15:19, Kyle Wheeler wrote: | On Friday, January 30 at 04:15 PM, quoth Aron Griffis: | >I guess the answer is, "Nobody on the mutt-users list can think | >of a way to do this." Right? ;-) | | Right. There's nothing inherent in the mailcap mechanism that you can | use for this. The c

Re: detect from mailcap whether called for view or reply

Cameron Simpson wrote: [Fri Jan 30 2009, 07:35:27PM EST] > You could get your reply keystroke macro to set some state before commencing > the reply, for example. Untested (and this hould be one line): > > macro index,pager r 'touch > $HOME/var/flag/80-colsrm -f > $HOME/var/flag/80-cols' Heh,

mboxes and maildirs in .muttrc

Hi, is it possible to mix local mboxes (processed by fetchmail) and local mirrored maildirs through offlineimap in one muttrc, in a way that they both show up in the folder-menu of mutt? I tried to do this, but it seems I'd have to decide between fetchmailed mboxes or maildirs with offlineima

Re: detect from mailcap whether called for view or reply

On 30Jan2009 20:06, Aron Griffis wrote: | Cameron Simpson wrote: [Fri Jan 30 2009, 07:35:27PM EST] | > You could get your reply keystroke macro to set some state before commencing | > the reply, for example. Untested (and this hould be one line): | > | > macro index,pager r 'touch $HOME/var/f