After re-sourcing my config, all the colouring and similar stuff
I do in folder_hooks is overwritten. Is it somehow possible to rerun
all applicable hooks as part of the resourcing?
--
martin | http://madduck.net/ | http://two.sentenc.es/
seen on an advertising for an elaborate swiss men's watc
Hi,
I didn't get a reply when I asked before, still keen to find out how
to avoid mutt creating/leaving an empty .muttxx fo9lder in the
directory in which an attachment is saved. I assume there's some
option to autodelete these folders?
--
Tim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday, September 23 at 02:20 PM, quoth Wilkinson, Alex:
>mmm, i liked the idea of this folder-hook so i tried it out.
>Is it meant to automagically delete duplicate threads ? If so
>the following folder-hook did sweet-fa for me :(
"sweet-fa"? Tha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday, September 23 at 10:58 AM, quoth martin f krafft:
> After re-sourcing my config, all the colouring and similar stuff
> I do in folder_hooks is overwritten. Is it somehow possible to rerun
> all applicable hooks as part of the resourcing?
0n Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 08:19:27AM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
>On Tuesday, September 23 at 02:20 PM, quoth Wilkinson, Alex:
>>mmm, i liked the idea of this folder-hook so i tried it out.
>>Is it meant to automagically delete duplicate threads ? If so
>>the following folder-hoo
=- Tim Chown wrote on Tue 23.Sep'08 at 10:31:27 +0100 -=
> I didn't get a reply when I asked before, still keen to find out
> how to avoid mutt creating/leaving an empty .muttxx fo9lder in
> the directory in which an attachment is saved. I assume there's
> some option to autodelete these folde
Of course one should always check the manual and try a web search
before asking for help. This is a given, and I don't think there's any
argument.
It's not always easy to find what you're looking for in the manual, and
it's not always straightforward to construct a search query that yields
what
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 04:08:35PM +0200, Rado S wrote:
> =- Tim Chown wrote on Tue 23.Sep'08 at 10:31:27 +0100 -=
>
> > I didn't get a reply when I asked before, still keen to find out
> > how to avoid mutt creating/leaving an empty .muttxx fo9lder in
> > the directory in which an attachment
=- Pau wrote on Tue 23.Sep'08 at 7:55:23 +0200 -=
> but sometimes find it difficult to look for the information,
> because a specific keyword is needed... then asking in the mailing
> list (as I did yesterday) is the only left option.
The type of question matters.
> I ask for apologies in advan
=- Tim Chown wrote on Tue 23.Sep'08 at 15:57:47 +0100 -=
> > Scan mutt-dev archive for this topic to understand origin, problems
> > and workarounds.
>
> Hmm, well the Yahoo view of mtt devs mails doesn't throw up
> anything obvious. I think 'folder', 'attachment', 'save' are too
> generic a term
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday, September 23 at 10:31 AM, quoth Tim Chown:
> I didn't get a reply when I asked before, still keen to find out how
> to avoid mutt creating/leaving an empty .muttxx fo9lder in the
> directory in which an attachment is saved. I assume
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday, September 23 at 05:10 PM, quoth Rado S:
>For me it was related to "NFS", and it was about tmpdir/tmpfile
>generation. Lookout for posts by me, I suggested a patch to "revert"
>the newly introduced behaviour.
http://marc.info/?l=mutt-dev&m=
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 10:28:33AM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
> http://dev.mutt.org/trac/changeset/c0e6d2617984/
>
> ~Kyle
> - --
> If an elderly respected expert in a given field tells you that
> something can be done he is almost certainly right. If an elderly
> respected expert in a given fi
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 11:54:19AM -0400, Jeff Kinz wrote:
> And if an elderly respected expert in a given field tells you
> RTFM, don't whine about it. RTFM advice is not (usually) an insult
> or an attempt to be nasty. Its usually valid and ALWAYS a good
> idea.
On the other hand, some people
Quoting Derek Martin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> No matter how much I love it, Mutt's configuration is intricate and
> complicated in the extreme;
You haven't tried configuring Sendmail, have you? ;-)
*SCNR*
-Sndr.
--
| Did you hear about the cat that ate a ball of wool? -- It got mittens.
| 1024D
* Sander Smeenk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-09-23 19:35]:
> Quoting Derek Martin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
>> No matter how much I love it, Mutt's configuration is intricate and
>> complicated in the extreme;
>
> You haven't tried configuring Sendmail, have you? ;-)
For a change you could have a look
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 07:33:31PM +0200, Sander Smeenk wrote:
> Quoting Derek Martin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > No matter how much I love it, Mutt's configuration is intricate and
> > complicated in the extreme;
>
> You haven't tried configuring Sendmail, have you? ;-)
As a matter of fact, bein
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 09:43:25AM -0500, David Champion wrote:
>
> What's the trouble? Let people ask questions honestly and politely,
> but if all you have to give is "rtfm", with no reference or citation or
> vague hint at a substantive answer, then don't bother replying -- or at
> least keep
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 09:59:37PM -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * Andrew Diederich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [09-22-08 21:49]:
> > Is there a way for mutt to tell me what values I've set, or what values
> > are default? For example, in postfix if I use "postconf -n" it tells
> > me what values I've
19 matches
Mail list logo
