Re: index_format setting to show yr

On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 7:42 PM, David Champion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Is there any way to setup mutt (the date_format variable?) such that >> in the index view, the year is shown only if the year of the message >> is different from the current year? The default "%d" shows only the >> "Mont

Re: gbnet address still used for mutt-users list?

> A few years ago messages to the mutt-users list (from Germany?) were > occasionally ending up in my inbox because they had been sent to what was > apparently some sort of alternative address for the list: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Is anyone aware if this address is still in any way active for t

Re: gbnet address still used for mutt-users list?

On Sat 06/21/08 at 02:12 AM -0500, David Champion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > If it is not, I'd like to remove the following from my .procmailrc: > > > :0 > > * ^Delivered-To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > $HOME/Mail/m/ > > Just use a List-* header instead: > List-Post: >

Re: gbnet address still used for mutt-users list?

David Champion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > A few years ago messages to the mutt-users list (from Germany?) were > > occasionally ending up in my inbox because they had been sent to what was > > apparently some sort of alternative address for the list: > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Is anyo

Re: gbnet address still used for mutt-users list?

Russell Hoover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat 06/21/08 at 02:12 AM -0500, David Champion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > If it is not, I'd like to remove the following from my .procmailrc: > > > > > :0 > > > * ^Delivered-To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > $HOME/Mail/m/ > > > > Just use a List-*

Re: gbnet address still used for mutt-users list?

> Not sure what you mean by "use a List-* header" -- I'm trying to clean out Several RFCs (e.g., 2369, 2919) specify mail headers beginning with "List-". These culminate (I guess) with inclusion in RFC 4021. Most modern mailing list managers support one or both of List-ID or List-Post. You can