display custom header mail index

2007-10-03 Thread Damaru
Hello mutt users, is there some some way to display the value of a custom header field of mails in the index mode? I was looked for some solution not very unlike: set index_format = " .. % .. " but i could not find any. thanks in advance, Damaru.

Re: display custom header mail index

2007-10-03 Thread Michael Tatge
* On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 Damaru ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered: > is there some some way to display the value of a custom header field > of mails in the index mode? No, just the expandos there are in index_format. HTH, Michael -- When someone says "I want a programming language in which I need only

Re: mark as read and save macro don't work correctly,

2007-10-03 Thread Raphael Brunner
On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 11:49:18PM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote: > On Wednesday, October 3 at 12:00 AM, quoth Raphael Brunner: > >Thanks for this idea, but now I have this: > > > >1. the macro 'pager d' don't work (also the same without $my_resolve). > >It seems, since the line is longer than before,

Re: mark as read and save macro don't work correctly,

2007-10-03 Thread Christian Ebert
* Raphael Brunner on Wednesday, October 03, 2007 at 13:14:09 +0200 > On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 11:49:18PM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote: >> Hmmm, there may be a limit on the length of a macro, which might be >> shorter depending on your version of mutt. That's my first guess. My >> other thought would

Re: mark as read and save macro don't work correctly,

2007-10-03 Thread Raphael Brunner
On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 01:54:48PM +0200, Christian Ebert wrote: > * Raphael Brunner on Wednesday, October 03, 2007 at 13:14:09 +0200 > > On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 11:49:18PM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote: > >> Hmmm, there may be a limit on the length of a macro, which might be > >> shorter depending on

GPG keyservers

2007-10-03 Thread Joseph
When you folks upload your key to the server do you get any conformation? gpg --send-keys ED0E1FB7 gpg --search-keys ED0E1FB7 gpg: searching for "ED0E1FB7" from hkp server subkeys.pgp.net gpg: key "ED0E1FB7" not found on keyserver Do these servers work? I have the follwing gpg key servers in my

Re: GPG keyservers

2007-10-03 Thread Alexander Dahl
> When you folks upload your key to the server do you get any conformation? No. > gpg --send-keys ED0E1FB7 > gpg --search-keys ED0E1FB7 > gpg: searching for "ED0E1FB7" from hkp server subkeys.pgp.net > gpg: key "ED0E1FB7" not found on keyserver > > Do these servers work? You don't have to try f

Re: GPG keyservers

2007-10-03 Thread Joseph
On 10/03/07 17:32, Alexander Dahl wrote: > > Do these servers work? > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:alex> gpg --recv-keys ED0E1FB7 > gpg: requesting key ED0E1FB7 from hkp server subkeys.pgp.net > gpg: key ED0E1FB7: public key "Sys. Concept Inc. (www.sysconcept.ca) > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" imported > > Greets

Re: GPG keyservers

2007-10-03 Thread Todd Zullinger
Joseph wrote: > That is strange, until I when I try to verify my own submission I > get: key "ED0E1FB7" not found on keyserver > > gpg --search-keys ED0E1FB7 > gpg: searching for "ED0E1FB7" from hkp server subkeys.pgp.net > gpg: key "ED0E1FB7" not found on keyserver What version of gpg do you hav

Re: GPG keyservers

2007-10-03 Thread Joseph
On 10/03/07 12:31, Todd Zullinger wrote: > Joseph wrote: > > That is strange, until I when I try to verify my own submission I > > get: key "ED0E1FB7" not found on keyserver > > > > gpg --search-keys ED0E1FB7 > > gpg: searching for "ED0E1FB7" from hkp server subkeys.pgp.net > > gpg: key "ED0E1FB7"

Re: GPG keyservers

2007-10-03 Thread Todd Zullinger
Joseph wrote: > I'm using gnupg-1.9.21 Huh. That's an old version of gnupg2. It may well have the same bug in it that the gnupg 1.x branch had. Try updating your gpg package. > and I tried it both with "0x" and without. > > gpg --interactive --recv-keys ED0E1FB7 > worked but it gives me an

Re: GPG keyservers

2007-10-03 Thread Joseph
On 10/03/07 13:37, Todd Zullinger wrote: > Joseph wrote: > > I'm using gnupg-1.9.21 > > Huh. That's an old version of gnupg2. It may well have the same bug > in it that the gnupg 1.x branch had. Try updating your gpg package. > What version are you using? The one the most stable marked in Gen

Re: GPG keyservers

2007-10-03 Thread Todd Zullinger
Joseph wrote: > What version are you using? > The one the most stable marked in Gentoo portage: > They have the new one: gnupg-2.0.7 but it has not been marked stable. I still use the 1.4 branch primarily. I've got gnupg-1.4.7. I do use gpg-agent from the gnupg2 branch, currently I've got gnupg2

Re: GPG keyservers

2007-10-03 Thread Breen Mullins
* Todd Zullinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-03 14:48 -0400]: Anyway, I do recommend asking on gnupg-users if you don't get things worked out. There are some helpful folks there, much as there are on this list. I just reproduced Joseph's report here - OS X with gpg 1.4.7 . Joseph, I'd defi

Saving without headers

2007-10-03 Thread Rem P Roberti
Can someone please tell if it is possible to save mail to a folder with only selected headers, or without any headers at all. I've been trying to find the answer in my Muttrc file, so far without success. TIA, Rem

Re: GPG keyservers

2007-10-03 Thread Joseph
On 10/03/07 12:40, Breen Mullins wrote: > * Todd Zullinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-03 14:48 -0400]: > >> >> Anyway, I do recommend asking on gnupg-users if you don't get things >> worked out. There are some helpful folks there, much as there are on >> this list. > > I just reproduced Joseph's

Re: Saving without headers

2007-10-03 Thread Gary Johnson
On 2007-10-03, Rem P Roberti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can someone please tell if it is possible to save mail to a > folder with only selected headers, or without any headers at > all. I've been trying to find the answer in my Muttrc file, so > far without success. The decode-save function

Re: Saving without headers

2007-10-03 Thread Rem P Roberti
On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 01:19:07PM -0700, Gary Johnson wrote: > On 2007-10-03, Rem P Roberti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Can someone please tell if it is possible to save mail to a > > folder with only selected headers, or without any headers at > > all. I've been trying to find the answer in

Re: Saving without headers

2007-10-03 Thread Joseph
On 10/03/07 13:19, Gary Johnson wrote: > On 2007-10-03, Rem P Roberti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Can someone please tell if it is possible to save mail to a > > folder with only selected headers, or without any headers at > > all. I've been trying to find the answer in my Muttrc file, so > >

Re: Saving without headers

2007-10-03 Thread Gary Johnson
On 2007-10-03, Rem P Roberti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks for the reply. I could not find a reference to the > decode-save function. Perhaps you could give me a heads up as > to where I could look for more info. You're welcome. Unfortunately, the only mention of it in the mutt manual

Re: Saving without headers

2007-10-03 Thread Rem P Roberti
On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 02:24:44PM -0700, Gary Johnson wrote: > On 2007-10-03, Rem P Roberti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Thanks for the reply. I could not find a reference to the > > decode-save function. Perhaps you could give me a heads up as > > to where I could look for more info. > >

Re: Saving without headers

2007-10-03 Thread Joseph
On 10/03/07 15:11, Rem P Roberti wrote: > >decode-save ESC s make decoded copy (text/plain) and delete > > > > which also appears in the index and pager help screens. The same is > > true for the decode-copy function. You may have to resort to > > experimentation or reading the code. > >

Re: Saving without headers

2007-10-03 Thread Michael Tatge
* On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 Rem P Roberti ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered: > > Can someone please tell if it is possible to save mail to a folder > with only selected headers, or without any headers at all. Selected headers are not possible afaik. No headers is easy - save the body in the attchment menu.

Re: [SOLVED] Re: mutt / postfix / relayhost

2007-10-03 Thread Chris Bannister
I wrote: > > What is the output of: > > mutt -v | grep sendmail > > > > for me it is: > > SENDMAIL="/usr/sbin/sendmail" you wrote: > > set sendmail="/usr/sbin/sendmail" > is just a MTA it already install on my machine so why not use it. It is a redundant setting if it is compiled in. Sav

Generate Reply / New Mail in new shell session

2007-10-03 Thread Joseph
It would be nice if it was possible to start a New Email or Replies in a new shell session and close it automatically when a mail is sent, without, going through postpone. Is it possible? Sometimes I have to look up/collect some information from several older emails so this kind of functionali

Re: fetchmailrc - polling local mail

2007-10-03 Thread Javier Rojas
On Mon, Oct 01, 2007 at 03:09:44AM +0200, Michael Tatge wrote: > * On Sun, Sep 30, 2007 Joseph ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered: > > My local mail is in /var/mail; I think they are mbox type. > > My home mail is ~/.maildir; this is where I want to pool the mail from > > /var/mail to my local mailboxes.

Re: fetchmailrc - polling local mail

2007-10-03 Thread Patrick Shanahan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 * Javier Rojas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [10-04-07 00:05]: [...] > I have all my local mail forwarded to my inbox, with this rule > > :0 > * .* > inbox/ > > be careful to put it at the end of .procmailrc; otherwise, the rest of > .procmailrc's rules won

extract pgp/gpg key

2007-10-03 Thread Joseph
According to manual ^K (ctrl-shift-K) is for "extract-key" when I tried it, I got: gpg: no valid OpenPGP data found. gpg: Total number processed: 0 Press any key to continue... The message was pgp signed. -- #Joseph GPG KeyID: ED0E1FB7

Re: extract pgp/gpg key

2007-10-03 Thread Todd Zullinger
Joseph wrote: > According to manual ^K (ctrl-shift-K) is for "extract-key" > when I tried it, I got: > > gpg: no valid OpenPGP data found. > gpg: Total number processed: 0 > Press any key to continue... > > The message was pgp signed. The keys aren't transmitted with each signed message in t