Hello Martin,
What about:
reply-hook '~t [EMAIL PROTECTED]' \
'my_hdr Fcc: =.Peoples.Michelle_K/'
Greetings
Michelle Konzack
Systemadministrator
Tamay Dogan Network
Debian GNU/Linux Consultant
--
Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/
Is there any actual difference between the 'push' and 'exec' commands?
Also, if I source something like the following:-
set mbox_type=maildir
exec save-message
set mbox_type=mbox
It doesn't do what I expect as the message *doesn't* get saved in
maildir format. Presumably this is s
On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 06:38:33PM +0100, Chris G wrote:
> Is there any actual difference between the 'push' and 'exec' commands?
>
> Also, if I source something like the following:-
>
> set mbox_type=maildir
> exec save-message
> set mbox_type=mbox
>
> It doesn't do what I expect
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, August 8 at 06:38 PM, quoth Chris G:
>Is there any actual difference between the 'push' and 'exec' commands?
Yes.
Push queues up characters to be read in *as if you'd typed them*
(though, confusingly, it also accepts function calls).
Hi Chris!
On Wed, 08 Aug 2007, Chris G wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 06:38:33PM +0100, Chris G wrote:
> > Would a sourced file containing a series of 'push' commands execute
> > them in the order expected (i.e. sort of backwards). For example if I
> > source the following:-
> >
> > push "
=- Chris G wrote on Wed 8.Aug'07 at 18:48:20 +0100 -=
> On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 06:38:33PM +0100, Chris G wrote:
> > Is there any actual difference between the 'push' and 'exec'
> > commands?
Yes, see wiki -> guide -> /Syntax
(or RTFM ;)
> > Would a sourced file containing a series of 'push' co
also sprach Michelle Konzack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.08.08.1923 +0200]:
> reply-hook '~t [EMAIL PROTECTED]' \
>'my_hdr Fcc: =.Peoples.Michelle_K/'
This saves the message I send to =.Peoples.Michelle_K/ whereas
I want to store the message to which I am replying. I'd use fcc-hook
for w
On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 08:30:14PM +0200, Rado S wrote:
> =- Chris G wrote on Wed 8.Aug'07 at 18:48:20 +0100 -=
>
> > On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 06:38:33PM +0100, Chris G wrote:
> > > Is there any actual difference between the 'push' and 'exec'
> > > commands?
>
> Yes, see wiki -> guide -> /Syntax
On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 08:17:59PM +0200, Christian Brabandt wrote:
> Hi Chris!
>
> On Wed, 08 Aug 2007, Chris G wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 06:38:33PM +0100, Chris G wrote:
> > > Would a sourced file containing a series of 'push' commands execute
> > > them in the order expected (i.e. sort
I have finally got what I want:-
s - saves a message in mbox format
S - saves a message in maildir format
by having the following in my muttrc file:-
macro index S ":push ^Mset
mbox_type=maildir^M"
macro index s ":push ^Mset mbox_type=mbox^M"
(OK, I need the same m
When I send PGP-encrypted e-mail using mutt to certain
certain recipients, it takes me a selection menu to choose
a particular key. In some cases there is only a single
choice. Once selected, mutt issues the following
diagnostic: "ID has undefined validity", and asks if
I want to continue (with
On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 07:27:21PM -0700, Gary Funck wrote:
>
> What do I need to do to get mutt to just use the keys
> I have on hand and to not be so picky? And what do I
> need to tell GPG so that it will raise the trust level
> on these keys? Or how do I determine their "validity"?
You want
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 12:45:23AM -0400, Cristóbal M. Palmer wrote:
>
> To set the trust of a key, visit the --edit-key section of your gpg
> manpage and look at the "trust" section. For a longer explanation, see here:
>
> http://www.gnupg.org/gph/en/manual.html#AEN335
>
> But if you met the o
13 matches
Mail list logo
